Issue Topic #12
Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The author asserts that Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. However, the following essay will argue this may not always be the cases.
Generally speaking, free university education surely beneficial for country in longer term. This is because higher education of people could lead to smarter (citizen) society in some cases. When people get more education for free, their intellectual 능력 capacity gets higher and this could result better choices for the country. Less education might result decay and corruption of country such as countries in Africa, they are struggling with basic standards of living issues and could not handle other things such as education, and hard to get improvement of country for decades. Also, this can give equal chances for higher education for students who are not able to afford expensive tuition. All students who want to study should get same chances, and this can decrease differences with the rich and the poor. Students can also focus on study. Lower pressure about tuition can make students less stress about other problems and can concentrate more. Accordingly, based on examples above, the author's asserts seem plausible to some degree.
However, the author's claim that free university education for students who has been admitted may not always be prudent. For instance, governments already offering education until high school and over that could be optional. Furthermore, college scholarship for superb students are also offering to some who could make their own way without further support of their parents. Thinking of limited budget of taxes, more than current could be burden. This can also lead to other side effects, such as some students could get lazy after admission (entrance) without financial burden of tuition. They don't need to take time and effort to study because the government will pay for this. Misuse and abuse of this program will lead to huge loss of limited money. Contrary to the author's claim, free higher education might not work well as expected.
In conclusion, the author's claim might be beneficial under certain circumstances, in light of above counterparts about drawbacks, such as misuse and abuse of policy, the author's claim cannot be fully agreed with.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gue this may not always be the cases. Generally speaking, free university educ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asserts seem plausible to some degree. However, the authors claim that free uni...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 598, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...thout financial burden of tuition. They dont need to take time and effort to study b...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion might not work well as expected. In conclusion, the authors claim might b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22340425532 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4928825801 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515957446809 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2406336271 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256121109872 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909219638595 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124946215679 0.0758088955206 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192564820685 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139505224739 0.0667264976115 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.