This topic and comparing these two options that maybe a parson will take towards the other one, is a little bit hard. But I believe in that adhering someone's idea in real form if you really like to , is better and safer in some situations in respect to the first one who is a real danger in political situation of different countries. I present my own reasons, including putting some countries in path of democracy in danger , it will be a dominant behavior and at last a nations identification will be in danger. I will explain them with of these factors one by one by coming up some examples related to them.
When we talk about a nation's identification we should take this into consideration that by defending and preventing against other interfering ideas, which a nation's wide never compromise a nation's identification can be preserved. Let's suppose that some countries use up some new ideas for making some protest for some revolution and them conducting these countries to a position and a path which is in consistent with their real identification. So compromising an idea here is so dangerous play if a nations's people take it as their core of behavior.
About some young countries which are in younger ages of some steps toward the democracy after breaking down a radical government, in process of training and persuading its potential, for accepting this idea which is accepted by nation's wide compromising will play a fatal role in this process. since most of the young adults who will be the future leader of country will compromise in appearance, instead of having discussions for persuading themselves they will find a way to compromise and leave the situation . And in counter part if a nation's leader plays as a radical government compromising will be dominant treatment.
when compromising turns to a dominant treatment a nation's rules and laws will be in danger. It will be like an extension of losing identification but this condition is worst that the preceding one. Let's consider young adults and children whom their some parts of training to some extent will be up to their society. when an adult could not find a certain and constant rule, even some inner rules which is conveyed by generations, how he or she will find himself or herself in a calm and constant social society.
In conclusion section we should take this point into account that compromising without having a clear position to be defined and recognized, is a rolling as a third party in a system and having lots of troubles for social systems like countries which are in the first steps of getting nearer to democracy and are so frail to defend themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...n will take towards the other one, is a little bit hard. But I believe in that adhering so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... idea in real form if you really like to , is better and safer in some situations ...
^^
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...countries in path of democracy in danger , it will be a dominant behavior and at l...
^^
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ll be a dominant behavior and at last a nations identification will be in danger. I wil...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 557, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'one by'.
Suggestion: one by
...will explain them with of these factors one by one by coming up some examples related to them...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...lated to them. When we talk about a nations identification we should take this into...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...which a nations wide never compromise a nations identification can be preserved. Lets s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ations identification can be preserved. Lets suppose that some countries use up some...
^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...will play a fatal role in this process. since most of the young adults who will be th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ay to compromise and leave the situation . And in counter part if a nations leader...
^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...he situation . And in counter part if a nations leader plays as a radical government co...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...omising will be dominant treatment. when compromising turns to a dominant treatm...
^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...dition is worst that the preceding one. Lets consider young adults and children whom...
^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ome extent will be up to their society. when an adult could not find a certain and c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, really, so, third, as for, even so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83736263736 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8602561752 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476923076923 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.1267373621 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.733333333 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154266719039 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557777182221 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349769199164 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911160261387 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296680988931 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.