The professor argue 3 points which are in contrast to what the passage presented. The professor talked about inside status of the building which are not proper for staying or living for large number of people, second he pointed out to having no tracing of grain maize on the floor or somewhere else, and at last he talked about other accumulation of materials there beside the pile of pots.
First, he pointed out that the inside the building, there were not enough fire places for the number of families which is mentioned in the passage. He said we've got around 10 or less than it, fire places. Even about the room he added, there were not enough rooms for families ti live there so this assumption for these buildings should be thrown away.
Second, there is no sign of grain maize on the floor. Even if we suppose that these buildings, had been using for such a purpose, we had to find some big containers which were going to be used for storing grain maize.
At last, the professor added that, in addition to accumulation of pots there, we have other pilings of building constructions material and other ones, which would lead to this assumption that they had used this places for trashes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: we've
...ch is mentioned in the passage. He said weve got around 10 or less than it, fire pla...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67136150235 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30866605318 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572769953052 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.5620978416 49.2860985944 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261789663187 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109472270048 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758493389787 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168824941473 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411161319191 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 63.6247240618 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.