It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Heroes are the people to whom we look up to and like whom we aspire to be. Usually, many of us have heroes in the respective fields that we work in or in the fields like acting. Every day we make endeavors to become like them one day. The prompt here asserts that it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. I strongly disagree with this statement for two reasons.
Firstly, with the advent of the internet, it has become very easy for everyone to find their own heroes. In the pre-internet world, many people were not regarded as heroes as they didn't have enough exposure to people. For instance, let us take the case of a YouTuber who plays guitar spectacularly. The people who have access to youtube and are interested may start to follow him and may regard him as their hero for guitar playing. In the pre-internet world, no one would have known about him and he would have never become a hero. Thus this example illustrates that the possibility of considering someone as the hero has increased rapidly with the onset of the internet.
Secondly, people are in need of heroes now, more than at any other time because of complex lifestyles. This pushes everyone to find their own hero which will eventually contribute to more number of heroes in society. As heroes are the ones who have done some great things in their field, this will motivate us to keep up our spirits and try to make endeavors to be like them in this complex world. For instance, in the game of cricket roles of each player have become quite complex. There are different roles like fast bowling all arounder, left-arm fast bowling all-rounder. Since roles have become very complex, one will try to choose the hero of their type. The right-arm fast bowler may choose Kapil dev as a hero which will help them to learn a lot of things from them. Thus the complexities in the world are encouraging everyone to find their own heroes which are contributing to an overall increase of heroes in society.
To conclude, Some may argue that the advent of the internet has also destroyed the reputation of many heroes to the extent where they are no longer considered heroes. However, the same internet also contributed to the finding of more heroes than ever. And also use of extreme language in the statement like "any living man or woman" clearly contradicts the current world scenario where many people are being regarded as heroes. Thus overall, it has become more possible to regard more people as heroes in the current society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ple were not regarded as heroes as they didnt have enough exposure to people. For ins...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... and he would have never become a hero. Thus this example illustrates that the possi...
^^^^
Line 6, column 776, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...hem to learn a lot of things from them. Thus the complexities in the world are encou...
^^^^
Line 9, column 439, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ny people are being regarded as heroes. Thus overall, it has become more possible to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6592920354 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43411499558 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451327433628 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6722161231 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.5652173913 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.652173913 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95652173913 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315832112749 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1002507199 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156283313759 0.0758088955206 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215328440591 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925760336067 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.