People of a society may turn into a praisable position so that he or she may be called a hero by the people of that society. The prompt suggests that a society is no longer able to consider any living man or woman as hero. I mostly disagree with this although I do concede that society may face some problems while continuing this practice.
Firstly, regarding any living person of a society as hero for his or her great deeds may motivate other people for the same tasks. People of that society may try to complete some tasks to become a hero. For instance, when a person starts to help the poor in a society to improve their condition and he or she is regarded as a hero of that society, people will get motivated to see him regarded as a hero or praised by the entire society. So, there will generate a common tendency among the people of the society to become hero by helping the poor. As a result, the entire society will be benefitted. So, regarding any living person as a hero will help the society to improve its condition by means of try of its own people. So, the society should continue the practice of regarding living persons as hero.
Secondly, some specific people of a society are called as hero for their role in the overall improvement of the society. A person, who invents new technology for the society, is generally considered as a hero. People of the society will get inspiration seeing that person regarded as hero. For illustration, when a person of a specific society develops a computer at affordable rate, he will be regarded as hero. People of that society will become more interested in innovation and apply their full effort keeping that person as a role model to be followed. So, regarding living persons as hero will help the people of the society to see some role models in their naked eyes. Thus, the society should not abandon this practice.
However, society may face some problems when it keeps on practicing to consider some living persons as hero. For example, if a living person, who is regarded as hero by the society for his previous laudable deeds, may start to perform some bad works. These bad works may influence the people of the society in negative direction. But this problem can be easily abated by the society by implementing laws equally for all, including the people who are regarded as hero.
To conclude, society should not abandon the practice of regarding living people as hero for inspiring people to good deeds and to motivate people towards innovation. This practice will help the society improve by its own people. The probability of facing problems due to the possibility of wrongdoing of the people regarded as hero can easily be eliminated by the strictness of the authority.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practicing considering'.
Suggestion: practicing considering
...may face some problems when it keeps on practicing to consider some living persons as hero. For exampl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6694214876 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53556762941 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.369834710744 0.4932671777 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.423796622 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1666666667 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224058362509 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950636668015 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502781461468 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161231487636 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275050134733 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.