Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing

Essay topics:

Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The government creates laws in order to have people be ensured with justice and enable the general nation's welfare. Laws should be able to protect those who are in a socially weak position and punish the powerful people who tried to manipulate and weak. I believe that laws should be flexible and comprehensive for those who needs protection, but should be strict for those who tried to manipulate the weak.
First of all, even though it is extremely difficult to satisfy all people, laws should be able to comprehend various situations for those who are susceptible to getting impaired. I would like to mention innocuous women In South Korea, who got involved in truculent transgressions by those are perceived to be socially and physically more powerful, men, as an example. Sexual criminality can occur in unprecedented situations through exceptional circumstances. However, the current law is only capable of protecting women who desperately fought back but did not cause any severe physical harm to the culprit. Which indicates that the women should be perceived vulnerable enough to be susceptible to physical abuse, but hardy enough to not be seriously harassed. Due to such stubborn laws that only takes certain situations in account, many women are still getting involved in truculent transgressions with unjust, while men can easily weasel out of the law and continue with pursuing pernicious behavior on innocuous women. Because the frigid law is incapable of ensuring justice, women had to create their own community online, to punish the culprits. If the law had been more flexible in comprehending various situations in account, many women would have been able to live without constant fear of getting impaired and not receiving any sort of relief.
Similarly, it is also compulsory for laws to be stubborn for those who are in a socially and physically powerful positions. Power to be able to control and manipulate other relatively weak people can be extremely enticing, and is hard to resist the temptation to utilize it. Which is why the laws should be able provoke their conscientious and help them become hardy to the temptation. Many government officials in each country are taking such opinion to account, and are applying the method to the laws, especially to restrict the actions of the industries. Industries have immense amount of mercenary and the public's trust, which is potent and can affect society and the environment in various ways. For example, in South Korea, the most celebrated company, Samsung, has the power to even compel the government officials to create laws that are unjust to the society. However, having strict laws makes such industries to constantly be cautious with taking the public's desires into account. Moreover, industries such as chemical companies can create abound chemical compounds that are exceptionally lethal to the environment and eventually to the human society. Strict laws should also be able to restrict such behaviors and have the industries to be unable to pursue actions that are lethal to the public and to the environment.
To sum up, laws cannot protect every single individuals and is also unreasonable to do so. I believe it is most effective when laws are comprehensive and flexible to those who are vulnerable, and are stiff to those who are powerful.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, still, while, for example, sort of, such as, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2789.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13627992634 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84060415144 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451197053407 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 887.4 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4816759638 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.772727273 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6818181818 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19509656149 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065297566952 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440792907342 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119933561639 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449445371573 0.0667264976115 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.