Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing

Essay topics:

Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Undoubtedly laws are made for people, to shape their behavior and the way of interactions between each other. People believe that laws should be strict; it should not show leniency to anybody irrespective to his name, fame or hierarchy. However, they acknowledge the fact that all criminals should not be treated equally without considering their situations or the causes of such occurrences. The prompt asserts that the laws should be pliable and it should be considerate about time, place or incidents. I strongly agree with the prompt and argue for three specific reasons.

First of all, laws are made to keep the people away from crimes, no to punish them blatantly. If the laws are stringent, all criminals will be treated under same criminal act; especially who are the victims of a transitory situation. For example, a man who is suddenly attacked by a group of robber may try to protect himself by hurting the robbers. But if the judge follows the well established laws of hurting other people or murder, the person will get a severe punishment, perhaps a death penalty. In contrast, a cold headed murderer also gets the same punishment for killing innocent people. When laws are hard and fast, people who are victimized to crime because of a sudden mishap, can't hope for clemency. Therefore, the penal codes should not be rigid, it should maintain a degree of flexibility.

Furthermore, flexible laws make people more respectful to the judicial department. Whenever a man or a woman did a crime accidentally, he or she would like to surrender and expect for fair judgement. On the other hand, if the general mass find the laws too strict, they will hardly cede and report their crime to the courts. Consequently, there will be more unreported crimes and riots will take place in the country. For example, during the African Black rights movement, many white people supported their possessions and fought for the same. The government started punishing the black and white for their acts. Eventually, more white people started participating in the movement to give the rights to the black as well as to make the arrested people free. Therefore, it can be safely stated that flexibility in laws can bring peace and trust among the laypeople.

To conclude, many people believe that flexible laws can account for more crimes. However, when the laws are kept flexible only considering the overall situation of the crime, it rules out that possibility. Hence, I strongly vie with the opinion that a country should keep its' laws flexible considering different circumstances.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...de to keep the people away from crimes, no to punish them blatantly. If the laws a...
^^
Line 3, column 690, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ed to crime because of a sudden mishap, cant hope for clemency. Therefore, the penal...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in contrast, as well as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02564102564 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72303378263 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8114045526 60.3974514979 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.7391304348 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.652173913 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26086956522 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169774582241 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543922736695 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378538970838 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115200030112 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342643721301 0.0667264976115 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...de to keep the people away from crimes, no to punish them blatantly. If the laws a...
^^
Line 3, column 690, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ed to crime because of a sudden mishap, cant hope for clemency. Therefore, the penal...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in contrast, as well as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02564102564 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72303378263 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8114045526 60.3974514979 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.7391304348 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.652173913 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26086956522 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169774582241 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543922736695 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378538970838 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115200030112 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342643721301 0.0667264976115 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.