Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is undeniable to refute that with the advancement of technology, the world has become more progressive. This dynamic attitude of our globe has made such rapid changes that most of us can't cope with the fluctuation. Many people start believing that quick changing of the earth make the lives of modern people dissatisfied and frustrated. I also agree with the idea that drastic changes have made our lives difficult and unstable compared to the lifestyle of our old generations which often result in obsession, frustration and unhappiness. I will provide three possible reasons behind my claim.
First of all, the fast changing makes the people feel less competent and less confident. People who can't adjust with the changes are often considered laggards which make them demotivated. They start losing interest to survive and their life don't attract them anymore. This situation is more common to the teenagers. Young generation who can't afford the latest developments often treat their lives unnecessary. In worst case scenario, it results in suicidal attempts too. For example, a recent article of the Economists shows that the suicide rate of US youths is raising alarmingly. After an investigation, it reports that the inability to cope up with their friends in terms of technological adaptation make them obsesses with their lives. Therefore, it is actually the groundbreaking change of the world which makes the life of our young generation miserable. In contrast, our past generation doesn't face drastic changes during their times. Certainly, there were changes but those were stable and gradual. People could afford those changes with the passage of time and become happy.
Secondly, quick changing makes our generation needy and greedy. We can't be happy with what we have. We always hanker after more and more which inhibits the growth morality and ethics in ourselves. We now consider adopting unfair means as a justified action since satisfying our needs is the prime priority. A recent study on Maslow's need theory shows that people are now focusing to the next level of needs on a greater scale compared to the people of nineteenth century: results in increasing number of crimes and fraudulent activities. However, our past generation was not facing that enormous changes during their era. They used to think simple and their requirements were also very rudimentary as well. As a consequence, they could lead a peaceful and happy life.
Last but not the least, our focus has been shifted as well due to the radical change of our surroundings which make our lives uncomfortable. More specifically, people of our past generation defined happiness as a life with healthy foods, strong bonding among family members and following the religious rituals perfectly. However, our generation defined happiness as to have higher social status, political influences and muscle powers. We now like to rule over others not to stay together. It is because the mindset we reformed over the years due to the change of our atmosphere. Since our definition of happiness has been changed, the scope of finding it also becomes changed and difficult. That's another reason why we are not happy whereas our parents and grandparents can lead a happy life.
In brief, it is certainly true that we are not happy like our past generation due to the radical changes of our world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...made such rapid changes that most of us cant cope with the fluctuation Many people s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...competent and less confident People who cant adjust with the changes are often consi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...sing interest to survive and their life dont attract them anymore This situation is ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n to the teenagers Young generation who cant afford the latest developments often tr...
^^^^
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'In the worst'.
Suggestion: In the worst
...nts often treat their lives unnecessary In worst case scenario it results in suicidal at...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 881, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...serable In contrast our past generation doesnt face drastic changes during their times...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 66, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...akes our generation needy and greedy We cant be happy with what we have We always ha...
^^^^
Line 8, column 681, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...g it also becomes changed and difficult Thats another reason why we are not happy whe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, as to, for example, in brief, in contrast, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2779.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 551.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04355716878 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84493438435 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59902639941 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491833030853 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 879.3 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 551.0 20.1344086022 2737% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2779.0 100.406767564 2768% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 551.0 20.6045352989 2674% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 156.0 5.45110844103 2862% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284891847225 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.284891847225 0.076458572812 373% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166800452543 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053465909774 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 277.8 11.7677419355 2361% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -487.79 58.1214874552 -839% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 218.2 10.1575268817 2148% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.43 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 34.86 8.01818996416 435% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 10.002688172 580% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 222.4 10.0537634409 2212% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.247311828 566% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.