Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The 20th and 21st centuries are characterized by all the momentous changes they made in humans' lives. Consequently, throughout history, changes which occurred in the world have played a prevailing role in human's life. In this regard, there is a long-standing, heated debate among people about whether volatile world situation has led people to become less cheerful and less pleased or not. Some people are leading proponents of the claim that owing to being hard to adapt to such world, people are less happy with their lives. Nonetheless, from my own perspective, this statement is false. As a matter of fact, I wholeheartedly disagree with such people and firmly believe that such changes give human beings advantage to have a better and prosperous lives. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into two conspicuous reasons so as to aptly elaborate on my standpoint.
the first exquisite point to be mentioned is that technology development provides individuals with the opportunity to get enjoyment out of life as much as possible. To shed light on this issue, in modern era, people are able to use state-of-the-art facilities, such as cell phones, video consoles, newest cars, and so on to have fun. In addition, owing to continuous alternations, these devices have been upgraded, leading to having more enjoyable experiences. On the other hands, in the past, folks just had limited entertainments and after a while because of devoid of changes, they got enough of them. Day-to-day changes, therefore, brings about a variable environment that people are more prone to be entertained.
Furthermore, it is established beyond doubt that majority of people have a strong hatred of monotony. In other words, people inherently have a genuine liking for changes. As a consequence, the same-old-same-old environment and stable situations could make a significant contribution to making folks depressed and disappointed. To take a personal experience as an instance, when I was studying for a bachelor degree, I was offered a job at accounting company. The company had a non-dynamic working environment rather that stimulating one. Subsequently, I got bored doing same things every day without learning new things. In the process, I handed in my resignation and quitted the job. Had I worked in a company that has a changeable environment, I would have not resigned from my job.
To wrap it up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that living in a volatile world is way too much enjoyable. I strongly recommend that individuals take these changes into consideration as opportunities which can lead them to a better lifestyle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 831, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...will delve into two conspicuous reasons so as to aptly elaborate on my standpoint. the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... to aptly elaborate on my standpoint. the first exquisite point to be mentioned i...
^^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the newest'.
Suggestion: , the newest
...ies, such as cell phones, video consoles, newest cars, and so on to have fun. In additio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I would have not resigned from my job. To wrap it up, contemplating all the afo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, as to, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22482435597 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22165687099 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594847775176 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0704180842 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.409090909 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4090909091 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31818181818 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211475353162 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506673354826 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619599587563 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108859263223 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899236944968 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.