It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree?
The 20th and 21st centuries are characterized by all the momentous changes they have made in human’s lives. Perhaps the most important milepost of these two centuries is education. Throughout history, teacher has played a prevailing role in human's life. In this regard, there is a long-standing, heated debate among people about for teachers to be both well-liked persons and useful ones who assist student to learn more effectively. Some people are leading proponents of the claim that being a popular teacher runs contrary with being a productive teacher. Nonetheless, from my own perspective, this statement is false. As a matter of fact, i wholeheartedly disagree with such people and strongly believe that by using assistance oh different ways, not only can teachers be well liked, but they can teach effectively. In the subsequent paragraphs, i will delve into two conspicuous reasons in order to aptly elaborate on my standpoint.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that nowadays due to the advent of technology, teachers are able to become the learning process more enjoyable than the past. To take a personal experience as an example, my uncle was a teacher in primary school where i studied. majority of our class’s students did not act within the rules of school. For instance, they did not sit for exams or listen to teachers while they are teaching. However, my uncle always takes advantage of teaching methods which children had liking for. He used some games on cell phone to teach mathematics or other subjects. Consequently, notwithstanding all the other teachers who student had dislike of, they loved my uncle as their teacher. Had he not utilized such methods. he would have not been such a popular teacher among students.
Furthermore, it is established beyond doubt that each student has her or his own characteristics. As a consequence, teachers can develop their skills to act with students in the ways which are appropriate for them. To shed light on this issue, a teacher can use specific ways to behave more effectively with students who have an introverted personality. By making improvements in their behavior to students, therefore, they are able to be popular while students are learning efficiently.
To wrap it up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that it is possible for teacher to be well liked and a good teacher. I strongly recommend that instead of using traditional ways of teaching, teachers make progress with their conduct and exploit up-to-date teaching methods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 850, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ectively. In the subsequent paragraphs, i will delve into two conspicuous reasons...
^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e was a teacher in primary school where i studied. majority of our class’s stude...
^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Majority
...her in primary school where i studied. majority of our class’s students did not act wit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 654, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a student'.
Suggestion: who is a student
... notwithstanding all the other teachers who student had dislike of, they loved my uncle as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 754, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...cher. Had he not utilized such methods. he would have not been such a popular teac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15903614458 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00918032145 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563855421687 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.828332577 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0869565217 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0434782609 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47826086957 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329581097203 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844645605794 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772989478381 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204386033902 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292645462469 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.