It is difficult for teachers to be both popular well liked and effective in helping students learn Agree or disagree

Education is the backbone of human beings’ lives since it paves the road of success for individuals, and teachers have always been played an important role in every educational system. In this regard, some people believe that it is hard for teachers to be widely enjoyed and effective in students’ learning simultaneously; however, I have enough reasons to object to this point of view, and I will illustrate some of which in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, students can talk about their problems with teachers whom they liked easier than teachers who are not popular, so popular teachers can be more effective in teaching students than can their counterparts. To put it in more vivid picture, it is no more secret to anyone that people tend to share their lives difficulties with ones whom they like. This is true especially for students who are in the early stages of their lives. In addition, having more experience than students, teachers can solve their educational problems as simple as possible. In other words, the more experience people have about a specific field, the easier they can solve problems in that field. As a way of illustration, take elementary schools’ teachers. It is a typical belief that they should be very friendly. Given that children can share their problems with approachable teachers easily as they often like warm teachers. Thus, knowing students’ problem, teachers can be effective in solving them.
Secondly, teachers’ popularity is inextricably linked to their abilities to help students in learning. As a matter of fact, students go to schools in order to collect new information and gain knowledge in different fields, so they tend to like teachers who can help them to achieve that purpose. As a result, should teachers have more good impacts on students’ learning, they will be more popular among students. I have to admit that my own experience is a compelling example of that. There was a professor in my B.S. University who helped students in their lessons very much. Furthermore, he allocated a considerable amount of his time to students and had a number of meetings with them during the day. Consequently, students were interested in his personality and liked his methods of educating. He was the most obvious example of a teacher who can be popular and can help students in learning at the same time.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that it is so easy for teachers to be popular and helpful to students in their courses, if they have some basic factors which I have mentioned above. That is due to the fact that, not only can teachers be popular when they help students in their courses, but also students can describe their educational problems with teachers whom they like.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2309.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97629310345 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78866902005 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476293103448 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.289984529 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.952380952 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0952380952 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52380952381 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311997282929 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110028664311 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789346356149 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222611625318 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404016794355 0.0645574589148 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.