Finding the best method to implement projects has always played an important role in human beings’ lives. In this regard, some people believe that doing many projects simultaneously is superior to starting each of them after finishing the previous one; whereas I have enough reasons to object to that vantage point, and I will illustrate two of which in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, working on one project, people can concentrate on it very well, so they can consider it from different points of view in order to achieve a comprehensive opinion about it with which they can solve its problems well. To put it in a more vivid picture, when people try to do a project, they should just think about it, while working on many projects, people are anxious about their results at the same time. As a result, they will not manage to focus on them, which will lead to bad performance and undesired results.
Secondly, people should allocate more time to each thing if they want to do a number of projects simultaneously. In other words, the more things people should do, the more time they need to complete all of them. To clarify this point, if people have to do several things at the same time, they will not be able to assign enough time to each of them because of their anxiety about the results of the projects. It is due to the fact that time is limited, and people can do only some limited number of things together. As a way of illustration, take my own experience. When I was in university, I wanted to be graduated as soon as possible, so I got several courses in order to gain that purpose. Consequently, I had to do a lot of projects at one semester, which was so time-consuming and made me worried. In the end, I could not have passed two of those courses because I did not allocate enough time to their projects.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that people should complete a project and then set out another one. Given that not only can people concentrate on one project better than focusing on many of them at the same time, but also they can assign enough time to each project since they do not have any anxiety about the results of other projects when they are doing the first one.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, while, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5297029703 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54120054806 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467821782178 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.770172233 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9333333333 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314626512615 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112831449906 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807381419125 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205174060935 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946418004487 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.