Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.

In such a sophisticated world where we live in, knowledge acquired by news comes to our aid in everyday life and paves the way for being successful and having a prosperous life. Throughout history, due to its paramount importance, knowledge has played a prevailing role in human's success. In this regard, there is a long-standing, heated debate among people about whether it is beneficial to watch and read new presented by people whose vantage point is different or similar from us. Some people are leading proponents of the claim that owing to consolidate our beliefs, watching news presented by people who have same views carries more weight. Nonetheless, notwithstanding all its merits, from my own perspective, this statement is false. As a matter of fact, I wholeheartedly disagree with such people and as far as I concern, I strongly recommend that people watch news presented by people from different views. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into two conspicuous reasons in order to aptly elaborate on my standpoint.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that it can make significant contributions to broadening our worldview. In other words, be watching news from both opponent and opposite's presentations, we are exposed to various side of an event which they consider to prove their views. Consequently, we come to a deeper understanding of occurrences. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by recent ground-breaking research conducted in our country, indicate that eighty percent of well-informed folks pursue news from different channels and resources. Watching news from different resources, therefore, can assist us to develop our knowledge base.
Furthermore, it is established beyond doubt that it can bring about changing our standpoint as a result of being erroneous. To take a personal experience as an example, few years ago, I was in a complete agreement with opinion of the previous president of my country. However, during election, by listening to rival parities’ news, I figured out I made mistake. In the process, I changed my mind. Had I not followed news from rivals TV channels, I would have not found out that my conviction was wrong.
To wrap it up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that following news presented by people with opposite views can offer various benefits and could at time be an asset. It is anticipated that if people take this action, society will take advantage of well-informed citizens, especially in political subjects.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider proving'.
Suggestion: consider proving
... to various side of an event which they consider to prove their views. Consequently, we come to a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25495049505 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18437587769 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601485148515 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0944223292 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.736842105 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300453454645 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763778333938 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842200219853 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157518887203 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963706295228 0.0645574589148 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.