Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Today's chaotic world is changing at an unbelievably swift pace, which raises the urge to pursue the daily news in order to keep up with recent events. In this line of thought, some people prefer to follow the news presented by people with resembling views, while the other group selects otherwise. After taking various factors into account, I, personally, concur with the latter group for two primary reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First, people, who hold the opposite view, enlighten the other sides of an issue, which may not have been noticed previously, resulting in a profound perception of it. To be more specific, people, who do entirely agree with a concept may not care about its drawbacks in the first place. On the other hand, critics and antagonists analyze the disadvantages of a notion and highlight them. In this way, watching or reading the counter viewpoint diminishes superficial thoughts and adds more depth to one's understanding. I take myself as an example to clarify this complex context. When I was at Tehran University, I pursued the university news on the Instagram page of TNEWS, which was an association of students, who looked critically at the university's decisions. I remember, back then, I was so happy that the university announced that they are going to renovate the library soon. A few days after starting the construction, TNEWS posted some pictures and explained that this construction project bothered a sum of students, who settled in the Fatemie Building. As a native student, I would never have thought about dormitory residents, whose educational performance might get affected by the library project's constant noises. Therefore, the opposite news illustrated new aspects for me to think deeper about this plan.
Second, knowing the contrary point provides individuals the opportunity to decide which side to stand on. Indeed, juveniles have not got well-equipped with vast useful knowledge and experience. Accordingly, they have to rely on and believe in the opinions of older people in different fields. However, sometimes, those imitated or copied ideas are misleading and wrong. Listening to the other view and criticisms may lead youngsters to change their minds and take the reasonable and correct side. This is an opportunity that would never have been gained if the youth ignored opponents and stuck to the agreeing party.
To sum up, following the news along with opponents is preferable because not only it provides a deep understanding of different news but also it enables young people to reevaluate their ideas and choose the right side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 498, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...rficial thoughts and adds more depth to ones understanding. I take myself as an exam...
^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have never been
...side. This is an opportunity that would never have been gained if the youth ignored opponents a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, to sum up, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17605633803 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82197215747 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607981220657 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8274716747 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172110303203 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043181811582 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417346311387 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103441013139 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231526719583 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.