Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The history of a nation is the key to creating a prosperous future. Learning history can be exerted through some activities, including visiting museums. In this line of thought, some people think that going to the museum is the best approach to get familiar with a country, conversely, the other group holds the opposite view. I, personally, concur with the former group for two main reasons.
First, museums are the places, in which antiques of a nation are preserved, and visiting them along with a guide boosts the learning of the culture and beliefs of that people. In this vein, the old pieces of equipment demonstrate how people lived previously, what they used in their rituals, what were the great values of different societies, and so on. Museums' work is to collect and protect ancient tools and employ some professionals and historians to inform people about them. In this way, the process of learning can get boosted. An example can make this complex context clearer. When I was a university student, I visited a Chinese museum. There were rich collections of clothes, ornamentations, teapots, and other imperial possessions. The guide at the museum assisted me to figure out that what was the philosophy behind each pattern, including the difference between red and gold dragons, on the empire family clothes, which was fascinating for me as a dress designer. Accordingly, I gained so much useful knowledge that I could not obtain even if I spent several hours surfing the internet or seeking books.
Second, visiting the museum provides the opportunity to see ancient goods closely, which gives a more consistent knowledge about them and their related nation subsequently through envisioning them. To be more specific, observing things causes more focus on that object and its linked data, which accelerates the learning process. To put it in other words, If an object is displayed to people, it would be easier to get recalled. On the other hand, when something is not tangible, limited attention is referred to it and it would get forgotten soon. I take myself as an example to clarify this. On that above-mentioned visit, I found an old teapot belonging to one of the empires of china, which was used to poison him. Even though I read about that teapot and its mechanism of function in one of my history courses, it was eliminated from my memory. However, when the guide elaborated on that issue and showed it with a teapot analogous to the antique one, I perceived the mechanism so profoundly that I haven't forgotten it.
In sum, the museum is the best place to study a nation's history and get apprised about their country. This is because it not only provides fine collections and guidance, which improve knowledge but also makes the history of that people easy to imagine in order to stick in mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1004, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ived the mechanism so profoundly that I havent forgotten it. In sum, the museum is th...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...the museum is the best place to study a nations history and get apprised about their co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2345.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90585774059 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69786969693 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52719665272 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9646528111 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.956521739 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7826086957 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153142821949 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448086360094 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358239107474 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934652996346 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255032598617 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.