Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are many different ways to learn about a country. One of the best way of learning about a country is knowing it's history. Therefore, there have been debates about whether visiting museums is the best way to understand a country or not. I believe visiting museums isn't the best way to learn about a country. I will explain my reasonings for this statement in the following essay.
First, books can aid us to understand about countries. Books and articles depicting the history of a country will give an in depth explanation about different cultures and help us learn about the country, even better than by visiting museums. For example, a book about Iran will contain explanations about each era, the culture of people during different periods, theories about why they acted in a particular way, and even how these cultures have shaped the current society. Some books include pictures and explanations about historical relics, which makes them as effective as visiting museums. Therefore, using books as a means to understand and learn about a country can have more effects on our knowledge about the history and culture of the country including recent years than visiting museums would. Even experts knowledgable about a country mainly learn from books rather than museums.
Second, the best resource of learning about a country is it's people. by speaking with the people of a country we can learn greatly about the culture and even the history, specially from elders. For example, professor Moghadam our teacher for world history in University expalined that most of his knowledge about different ethnic groups of Iraq came from traveling to the region and speaking with it's people. He said by talking to the elders of villages he learned knowledge not offered in any of the books, gained understanding about different ceremonies, and where they originated from.
In conclusion, even though visiting museums is a good way to understand the history of a country there are better ways including reading books and interacting with people to learn about a country. Therefore, I believe using aformentioned routes is a better way of learning about countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
There are many different ways to learn about a country. One of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'knows'
Suggestion: knows
...he best way of learning about a country is knowing its history. Therefore, there have been...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...he best way of learning about a country is knowing its history. Therefore, there have been...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ntry or not. I believe visiting museums isnt the best way to learn about a country. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...learning about a country is its people. by speaking with the people of a country w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09577464789 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67159895642 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456338028169 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8947699756 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.411764706 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314972480536 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143877618037 0.076458572812 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734328345454 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240851299651 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914984736049 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.