Do you agree or disagree the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree the following statement? In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.

It is no secret that all aspects of human’s life have made major changes on account of technology improvements, especially after the industrial revolution in the 19th century. One of these concepts is transportations. Prior to advantageous invention, cars, invented by Henry Ford ,the founder of Ford Motor company, people were forced to spend a lot of time to transfer between to places, even in the same city. However, nowadays cars facilitate people’s transportations. Thus, throughout history, cars have played a prevailing role in human’s life and its benefits are undeniable. In this regard, there is a long-standing, heated debate among folks about whether the number of cars will decline in not-too-distant future or not. Some people are leading proponents of the claim that due to polluting the environment, cars number will reduce. Nonetheless, from my own perspective, this statement is false; as a matter of fact, I totally disagree with such people and I strongly believe that the number of vehicles will dramatically increase in future. In the subsequence paragraphs, I will delve into three conspicuous reasons in order to aptly elaborate on my standpoint.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that by elapse of time, technology revolutionized the system, process, and devices, leading to manufacture more up-to-date and optimistic vehicles. Nowadays, seldom factories use out of date production methods. Instead, they use more optimal processes and paces which trigger to decrease the total production time and aggregate costs of the factory. Additionally, they produce electronical cars instead of gasoline-powered cars. To shed light on this issue, because of such alternations, petrol, the main source for driving, will be unused. In other words, in modern technological transports, fossil fuels are substituted by electricity, which triggers cars to produce lesser amount of pollution. Avoiding those type of vehicles, therefore, cushions the world from dreadful consequences.
Furthermore, it is established beyond doubt that the demands for purchasing new automobiles is escalating. Two primary factors, which are directly proportional to number of cars, population and automobile factories’ products, are sharply rising. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by recent ground-breaking research conducted in my country, indicate that in 2021, capital growth rate of car factories accelerated significantly as a result of demands rise. In fact, since the world population augments, the number of people who commonly utilize car for their daily working and traveling rises as well. Moreover, the transport will be cheaper than the current period as technology allows companies to reduce manufacturing costs. Indeed, Technology plays a crucial role in transportation developments, which provides a number of benefits to car users, leading to a significant increase in customers.
To warp in up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that factors including technology, population, and factories will make a contribution to rising car numbers. Admittedly, I recommend that people buy electronical cars in order to cause lesser environmental issue

Votes
Average: 8.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... invention, cars, invented by Henry Ford ,the founder of Ford Motor company, peopl...
^^
Line 1, column 1041, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... of vehicles will dramatically increase in future. In the subsequence paragraphs, I will ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out of date production methods. Instead, they use more optimal processes and pace...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2733.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69375 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32477808366 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 294.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 851.4 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8152211418 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04166666667 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153474358695 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394007905692 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030681530322 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870142424541 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134014426385 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.01818996416 129% => OK
difficult_words: 174.0 86.8835125448 200% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... invention, cars, invented by Henry Ford ,the founder of Ford Motor company, peopl...
^^
Line 1, column 1041, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... of vehicles will dramatically increase in future. In the subsequence paragraphs, I will ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out of date production methods. Instead, they use more optimal processes and pace...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2733.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69375 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32477808366 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 294.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 851.4 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8152211418 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04166666667 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153474358695 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394007905692 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030681530322 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870142424541 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134014426385 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.01818996416 129% => OK
difficult_words: 174.0 86.8835125448 200% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.