Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
The reading claims that creating a new kind of broccoli which can plant and grow in East Coast of the United States has several benefits. Nonetheless, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author argues that owing to a decrease in transportation costs, new broccoli will be cheaper. On the contrary, the lecturer brings up the idea that this reason is highly controversial due to the fact that although it makes contribution to saving on transportations costs, it will not offer any reduce in sell cost as a result of its capability of growing less amount per land than others.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that owing to using traditional breeding techniques rather than argumentative genetic modification technology, people will have more tendency to purchase. In contrast, the speaker underlines the fact that it will be created by the same company which utilize genetic modification technology. Consequently, folks may reject this new broccoli as a yield of being the product of the same company.
Finally, the reading asserts that due to consuming soon after harvesting, people will become able to exploit additional nutrients and vitamins. Conversely, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that there are other vegetables in East Coast which have comparable health benefits as much as broccoli.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, so, in contrast, kind of, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24553571429 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9009992066 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7293436237 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.555555556 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1111111111 7.06452816374 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849568765783 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357044840109 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00869870033639 0.0662205650399 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0499989120389 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124641744232 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.