Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Considering the dizzying development speed of technology we are witnessing today, it seems very challenging to correctly predict the future. Although some people believe the number of private cars will decrease in twenty years as public transports will be renovated and become widely available, I don't think this will be the case. On the contrary, I expect there will be even more car owners in the 2040s.

To be honest, my opinion is based on the developments I have been observing in the car industry. Within a decade, there have been a myriad of impressive renovations for car models, much more than those for other vehicles such as trains or bicycles. For example, there are automatic cars that employ AI to predict and reduce traffic accidents to the lowest possible number. Such application of AI has not been seen in any other means of transportation, suggesting four-wheeled automobiles are leading in the transformation of future transportation. In 20 years' time, when we are closer to the climax of information and technology age, self-driving cars will inevitably continue to be the trend, or even the vehicle of the future.

Moreover, the primary factor that makes most people doubt the prevalence of cars in the future is its pollution threats due to carbon emissions. However, as far as I know, this is no longer a problem in certain modern models of electric and alternative fuel cars. Car engineers and scientists have continuously conducted research and experiments in order to improve and maximize their environmentally friendly features. These models of cars have been working well so far, receiving lots of credits and expectation for their growth. In a few years when cars are more upgraded and have become more affordable to public consumers, it will be easy to see their potential in rising to the top means of transport.

All in all, I feel that people in the future will keep on preferring private cars as they do now, especially when this type of vehicle is considerably transformed to the most convenient, intelligent and sustainable automobile ever existed.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...enovated and become widely available, I dont think this will be the case. On the con...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, well, for example, i feel, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07246376812 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99589581335 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0595013738 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159161248097 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05548491472 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462393988713 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100862467521 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466265125474 0.0645574589148 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.