Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Rapid growth of digitization and advancement in information technology fosters the enhanced use of e-mail as a form of formal and informal conversation in present decade. People believe that it makes the communication much convenient as such students or colleagues can perform a project or assignment without having a face to face interaction. Although many believe that it is much more convenient than the face to face communication, other people cast serious doubt about its' efficacy as a learning device. I also believe the same and agree that communication in person can result in far better outcome than communication via e-mail. I will provide three specific reasons to support my claim.
First, in-depth learning can only be possible whenever you perform the task in person. It is due to the reason that active learning and cross-communication among different members can be ensured when the group members are gathered in a place and share their views. For example, I often try to understand the concepts of my group mates in a face to face conversation session and make my own statements accordingly. Physical presence enables me to think deeper and analyze closely about a fact or position. However, when I tried to do the same via e-mail, I often could not understand the inner meaning of a concept, I have to make a personal schedule to conceive the inherent significance. As we are exposed to a wide variety of opinions in a consolidated discussion, learning becomes more last longing and thorough.
Secondly, in person communication process involve both viewing and hearing which is far more durable than viewing only via e-mail. There are many scientific evidences behind this claim as well. For example, a recent study showed that whenever people are exposed to viewing and hearing a presentation at the same time, the hearing has longer and benign effect on him compared to viewing only. For instance, I often forget what I have seen in the slides during my class time as I hardly concentrate on them for a long time. However, I can hear with full concentration about what my teachers are discussing and help me to resemble the actual scenario. Therefore, I become more active whenever there is a live interaction among my partners regarding any assignment or project and the final outcome becomes much fruitful. In contrast, e-mail learning doesn't prolong for a single day in my mind and often I struggle to memorize the concept.
Thirdly, face to face interaction enhances the productivity of the individual which enables them to do the task in a shorter time and focus on other tasks as well. People when are gathered together make a stringent plan to accomplish the task within a short time and then focus on another pending task. For example, I like to make group tasks whenever I am assigned to more than one task as such I can complete all the tasks from a single discussion session. On the other hand, e-mail tasking reduces my productivity as I always believe that my friends will always be available to do the task online. Consequently, the final output can never be accomplished in time.
To conclude, I strongly prefer in person communication instead of e-mail learning as it is more effective, last longing and productive.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 847, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... fruitful. In contrast, e-mail learning doesnt prolong for a single day in my mind and...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2717.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96709323583 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92436235162 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480804387569 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 879.3 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1408209432 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.208333333 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7916666667 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176569842656 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506236363731 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414225146623 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104611472795 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420507292666 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 847, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... fruitful. In contrast, e-mail learning doesnt prolong for a single day in my mind and...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2717.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96709323583 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92436235162 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480804387569 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 879.3 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1408209432 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.208333333 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7916666667 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176569842656 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506236363731 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414225146623 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104611472795 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420507292666 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.