Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
there is no doubt that in these modern eras thanks to the development of technology great deal of humans are incline to use internet based devices for their class projects or works meeting. Hence, while some people believe that classmate's communicating online for a project is more efficient for producing better project, I am of the opinion that doing the project in person can be more effective and the students can make better work for the project. I will mention some of my idea in the following paragraphs.
At first, this is critical that people specially classmates share their tasks in person rather than by e-mail to be sure by observing eachothers possetive and negative feeling or idea about specific duty at the time. To be more specific, I think when people try to do their duties for a project online, maybe they cannot realize about one another's actual feeling or critisism, then it can effects negatively on the work process of project, because if each member cannot convince the others, as a result cause some discoragment. Even cause the project will stop for ever. As an illustration, I remember we had an architctural project for the university final semester that because we didnot have enough time to meet eachotherin person to communicate about that, thus all of us knew the main points, but during the works of project online we faced with missunderstanding of sharing tasks, unfortunatelly, our project destroied completely, and we lost the huge mark.
The other reason that worthy to say is when colleagues communicate with one an other in person, they reach in a consensus early than waiting for their mate's responces through online softwares like e-mail. In detail, when people work separetly, then try to send their achivment step by step through e-mail, it causes delay,because all the memeber of a group cannot be online in the same time. So it should be more beneficial to communicate and share their information in person, then surely, they produce better comprehensive project. For instance, when my sister had her own subject to search about, as a member of group, she strives to find as much as possible materials, then, when she shares them by e-mail the leader of group answer her lately, cause some anger and anxies, as a result they reach the consunses about fiftheen days later and they didnot expect their employee's bad feedback, it just because they could not share their information in time and correctly.
To wrap it up, as I mentioned in the pervious paragraphs, the communacation about a project, not only can help members to done their tasks effectively in good condition, but also they can reach sooner in critical consunses which is so important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there is no doubt that in these modern eras t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'effect'
Suggestion: effect
...ctual feeling or critisism, then it can effects negatively on the work process of proje...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...is when colleagues communicate with one an other in person, they reach in a consensus ea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , because
... by step through e-mail, it causes delay,because all the memeber of a group cannot be on...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, while, for instance, i think, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2251.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94725274725 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74528632921 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531868131868 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.977505136 48.9658058833 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 187.583333333 100.406767564 187% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.9166666667 20.6045352989 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352422699368 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135964558506 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649814778956 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210058301975 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086928942762 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 11.7677419355 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 58.1214874552 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.1575268817 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.