Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Personally, I definitely think that working on a project with my group using e-mail is more effective than doing it personally. Therefore I disagree with the given statement. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, it is more time efficient to communicate by e-mail or any other applications such as WhatsApp or Facebook than doing it personally. Obviously, when you want to work with your group, you have to make an appointment with all of the group members where all of them are free. Because if a single member is not able to come, the whole meeting will be canceled. Thus, it will be a waste of time to wait for all members and arrange a proper time. For Instance, when I was in high school, I was working with my group on a Science project. One of my team members was working after school, so she did not have time to meet up with us every day. As a result, we were late and could not submit the project on time.
Second, working online together is much easier. Evidently, when you work with your team online using e-mail, you will be able to work in any place and any time, whenever you want, and wherever you want. Hence, you will finish your work faster. For example, I remember when I was in college, I worked on a computer project with my team. Although each one of us where from a different city, we were able to do a fantastic project. Thanks to the e-mail and other communication applications.
To sum up, I firmly believe that working on projects with your team is more efficient by using e-mail and any other remote communication tool. This is because it will save all team members time, and it makes communication and works much more flexible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ore effective than doing it personally. Therefore I disagree with the given statement. I ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...p, you have to make an appointment with all of the group members where all of them are fre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work with your team online using e-mail, you will be able to work in any place an...
^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... you want, and wherever you want. Hence, you will finish your work faster. For ex...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48253968254 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52214180698 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495238095238 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7820817358 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4444444444 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320766802382 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112106368364 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591229238898 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226894389692 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475728946739 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.