Today, communication changed with advert and improvement in technology and internet. Then, some academics prefer their communicate about their assignment or task with teammates via electronic mail. However, I think, for two reasons, eye-to-eye contact has better results in projects I will explain my view points in following.
The first and foremost reason coming to my mind is that direct contact prevents misconception and misunderstanding. To be more specific, when there are talking about topic via email there are not any feelings or voice tones, or other impressions. Even, in some cases, people harvest opposite opinions about our idea. Nevertheless, when they talk face to face, misunderstanding is reduced greatly. If even, there is incomprehension we can resolve it. While, on email, we cannot, even, find that. I remembered, during my bachelor's degree, I had a project that I should do with my two classmates. Because, there were at a great distance from my dorm, we did it via our email. Thus, we share our knowledge and research together and one of us was responsible to use that and get the outcome. But after she presented in class we would see many faults which were away from our opinion. As a result I did not do any project via email afterward.
The second north worthy reason is that a project on face-to-face conditions does a quicker. In other words, people do not have access to their email everywhere. Also, the internet connection does not exist in all regions then when we send a message we should stay for many hours to give response from co-worker. Sometimes the project deadline is close or limited therefore if a project do on email, it has possible not only lost time but also as consequence lost its score. For instance, during corona pandemic, our teachers were force by students to move assignment’s finishing time since all students worked via email or other social networks with their classmates to do that. Some professors had flexible manner to this request but some were firm so many students in cases lost scores and this had not great effect on their final grades.
In conclusion, using email in minor communication for projects has advantageous but for the whole this cannot great outcomes at all also we might lose the deadline. Therefore, I think it is better to use email and other social networks for projects besides in-person situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mail. However, I think, for two reasons, eye-to-eye contact has better results in...
^^
Line 2, column 880, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...aults which were away from our opinion. As a result I did not do any project via e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, talking about, as a result, in my view, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9825 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84624203995 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5675 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0628423857 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5909090909 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22727272727 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209713055145 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602704776852 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048959400739 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145407935432 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373521816696 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.