Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The way of communication while working on a project is highly important. In my opinion, people could produce better outcomes if they were able to meet in-person. I feel this way for many reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, face-to-face interaction guarantees a chance for immediate feedback from people, which is not possible when contacting each other via e-mail. As a result, less mistakes would be made. For example, misspellings and typos are relatively common in e-mails which often lead to misunderstandings between partners. On the other hand, getting together to discuss the assigned task offers the opportunity to fully explain ideas and avoid any misinterpretations. Another idea, which could be included under the same umbrella, is the lack of emotions when using emails. To expand more on that, In the case of emails as a method of reaching out to other colleagues, if one side suggested the project should go in a certain direction and other people were not completely comfortable with this, they would not be able to express their likes or dislikes about the issue through writing. However, a meeting would rather encourage people to at least give hints about their feelings.
Second, real life communication helps the quick evolution of ideas. One person could be thinking about something. which she or he has some knowledge about but lacks other pieces of information. This would result in the idea to be abandoned by the individuals when they find out that clues are missing to reach a fully developed idea or decision for the project. Nevertheless, people in a conversation could mention some details and other members in the group instantly start to build on these threads to land on the best ideas possible for the task. A group of people together will efficiently see the whole picture as missing pieces will begin to appear from every mind, assuming each of them has a different set of skills and knowledge which will see the issue under consideration from a distinct point of view. Unfortunately, that's not the case with e-mails as there is no real-time dialogue to help polish hypotheses or put them under immediate investigations by other participants.
In conclusion, feedback plays a vital role in finishing assignments, which, in turn, makes meeting in-person is far superior to correspondence through emails when working on a task. This is mainly because a gathering of emplyees or students will allow less errors to happen, provide a way of communicating emotions and increase efficiency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ing each other via e-mail. As a result, less mistakes would be made. For example, mi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...rson could be thinking about something. which she or he has some knowledge about but ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 830, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... distinct point of view. Unfortunately, thats not the case with e-mails as there is n...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 253, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun errors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ring of emplyees or students will allow less errors to happen, provide a way of comm...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, at least, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11666666667 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95205067277 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9043668065 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.105263158 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1052631579 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57894736842 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188468770979 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578206293856 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419871379433 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131967187531 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613641199209 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.