Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
there is no doubt that in these modern eras, thanks to the development of technology great deal of humans are inclined to use internet-based devices for their class projects or works. Hence, while some people believe that classmates communicating online for a project is more efficient for producing a better project, I am of the opinion that doing the project in person can be more effective and the students can make better work for the project. I will mention some of my ideas in the following paragraphs.
At first, this is critical that people especially classmates share their tasks of a project in person rather than by e-mail to be sure by observing each other's positive and negative feelings or ideas about specific duty at the time. To be more specific, I think when people try to do their duties for a project online, maybe they cannot realize one another's actual feelings or criticism, then it can effects negatively on the work process of the project, because if each member cannot convince the others, as a result, cause others some discouragement. Even cause the project will stop forever. As an illustration, I remember we had an architectural project for the university final semester that because we did not have enough time to meet each other in person to communicate about that, thus, all of us knew the main points, but during the works of project online we faced misunderstanding of sharing tasks, unfortunately, our project destroyed completely, and we lost the huge score.
The other reason that worthy to say is when colleagues communicate with one another in person, they reach a consensus earlier than waiting for their teammate's response through online software like e-mail. In detail, when people work separately, then try to send their achievement step by step through e-mail, it causes delay, because all the members of a group cannot be online at the same time. So it should be more beneficial to communicate and share their information in person, then surely, they produce a better comprehensive project. For instance, when my sister had her subject to search about, as a member of the office group, she strived to find as many as possible materials, then, when she shared them by e-mail, leader of the group answered her late, cause some anger and anxiety, as a result, they reached the consensus about fifteen days later and they did not expect their employer's bad feedback. It just because they could not share their information in time and correctly.
To wrap it up, as I mentioned in the previous paragraphs, communacation about a project, not only can help members to do their tasks effectively in good condition, but also they can reach sooner in vital consensus which is so important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there is no doubt that in these modern eras, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'effect'
Suggestion: effect
...tual feelings or criticism, then it can effects negatively on the work process of the p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, while, for instance, i think, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93275488069 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76599632899 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520607375271 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.1344086022 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.024522988 48.9658058833 219% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.923076923 100.406767564 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.4615384615 20.6045352989 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343581960287 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126407576557 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669211769103 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207210630172 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750212898592 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 11.7677419355 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.0537634409 159% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.