Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

University education is often considered the most vital part of a student's life. It is the stage after which students decide their career and ensure future growth. The persons which have the active participation in this learning phase should certainly be respected with maximum level of benefits. Therefore, I strongly agree with the aforementioned statement that universities should increase their budgets on the salaries of the university professors. I will explain my position with three possible reasons and examples.

First of all, it is needed for the sake of our students. More specifically, whenever a university spends a large amount of funds behinds its' faculty members, it gets a higher index number in the world university ranking. And a better ranking indicates that the graduates from this university are actually extraordinary and intellectual than others. For example, a recent survey by the QS university ranking shows that, universities which are in the top twenty list of the world, actually offer the highest level of salary to its' faculty members. In other words, high payment is an indicator that the university authority supports and promotes the research and other novel contributions of the faculty researchers which attract the competent students to admit in that university. In this connection, it can be said that if we want to raise the rank of our university, we are actually compelled to increase our allotments for the faculty members.

Secondly, additional expenses will enhance the motivation and confidence of the university course instructors. Teaching job is largely dependent on the mental satisfaction level, it can't be measured physically. Therefore, an increment in wages can being positive outcomes. For instance, whenever a teacher is honored with satisfactory level of income, he will try to justify his payment by improving his current style of delivery. He will always try to enhance his teaching methods, take parts in the administrative decisions and policies and so forth. A recent study by the US News shows that, teachers' working hours raise proportionally with the increment level of salary. Therefore, in order to bring a strong motivation force, budgets should be increased for the teachers.

Last but not the least, a handsome amount of salary for the university teachers will also inspire other apprentices to study well. Undoubtedly, when the students find the salary of a teacher lucrative, they will be more interested to choose university teaching as a profession. In USA, one of the toughest job to find is the university teaching profession. According to a recent news, almost 8-10 candidates fight for a single teaching position in a university. The US universities are very well reputed for their attractive salaries for their professors. Since only the best of the best can secure the post of a faculty, the students will be cheered up to concentrate more on studies. Consequently, their learning level as well as overall performance would be improved too.

In brief, additional budget allocations for the teachers will not only aid the university professors but also benefit the students. In this circumstances, I strongly vie with the above statement and I believe it should be followed strictly.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ten considered the most vital part of a students life It is the stage after which studen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ent on the mental satisfaction level it cant be measured physically Therefore an inc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ent on the mental satisfaction level it cant be measured physically Therefore an inc...
^^^^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...essors but also benefit the students In this circumstances I strongly vie with the a...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in brief, as well as, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2702.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 520.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19615384615 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93009279494 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471153846154 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 876.6 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 520.0 20.1344086022 2583% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2702.0 100.406767564 2691% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 520.0 20.6045352989 2524% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 162.0 5.45110844103 2972% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296267921169 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.296267921169 0.076458572812 387% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176241175975 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531537669114 0.0645574589148 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 263.1 11.7677419355 2236% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -464.78 58.1214874552 -800% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 207.3 10.1575268817 2041% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.36 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 33.1 8.01818996416 413% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 10.002688172 600% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 210.0 10.0537634409 2089% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 60.0 10.247311828 586% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.