The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
The statement describes about the luxuries and conveniences being provided from the initial stage, hinders in measuring overall potential and capabilities of an individual. Rich familiies, often pamper their kids right from the childhood by providing flood of choices in every aspect; which later becomes a habit and necessity and could not compromise in any condition. These provision of luxury and convenience in all sort of things ultimately neglects the significance of factors such as hard work, perseverance and achievement happiness.
Consider a case wherein a kid born and brought up in a rich family and he being provided with surplus amount of resources for his daily needs. On the contrary, a child which came from poor family background and having limited amount of basic necessitites; knows the actual value of the things. Child nurturing plays a significant role in inculcating habits by providing scenarios of all kinds right from financial poor condition to the middle and rich class family condition. A person can only understand the real value of any particular thing by earning it with an honest manner.
On the other hand, giving everything that an individual demands might lack the real value and could waste the resources neglecting the importance that the needy ones have. Such an individual when being presented openly among the public, he/she could feel inferior by having absence of convival nature and readiness to be involved with anyone. Since, the person has been benefitted with all the necessities more than required, the perception of viewing the world changes and a power of superiority develops in one's mind.
However, this is not the case particular everytime; there are several examples of great successful people which been born and brought up in rich families and still they became successful by their own and not by the support of their family background or richness. Consider an example of Indian philanthropist and business tycoon, Ratan Tata, who had access of all means right from his childhood, still he falsifies the given statement by becoming a successful person regardless of having luxuries and conveniences being provided to him in his contemporary life.
Thus, I would agree to the given statement since, the real value of any item could be known by achieving it through hardwork and perseverance. However, there are certain examples where this statement fails by setting up as the true independent individual regardless of luxuries and conveniences.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... and brought up in a rich family and he being provided with surplus amount of resourc...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 510, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... and a power of superiority develops in ones mind. However, this is not the case...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, thus, sort of, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28179551122 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84926005245 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548628428928 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2769197691 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.285714286 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6428571429 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141736213601 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468841494708 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432664674991 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770883041546 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330844401884 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... and brought up in a rich family and he being provided with surplus amount of resourc...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 510, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... and a power of superiority develops in ones mind. However, this is not the case...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, thus, sort of, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28179551122 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84926005245 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548628428928 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2769197691 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.285714286 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6428571429 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141736213601 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468841494708 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432664674991 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770883041546 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330844401884 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.