Technology industry has witnessed booming growth in the recent years, which in turn provided people with lot of luxuries and conveniences. Several facilities have been improved in recent years which helped mankind to think beyond their daily needs. Thus, I would disagree that luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
To support my opinion, I would like to state a few examples. A society which has luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life will certainly have low crime rate. There will be less social issues such as abortion of girl child, early marriage of girl child, less literacy rate and many more. People belonging to that society will have sufficient to think beyond the monetory needs. Such scenarios not only help in developing a safe and sound society, but people could think about development that could serve the society in long run. The luxuries provided could help the individual to save time, which could be utilised in exploring variety of interests.
A society which has luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life will provide people with ample amount of jobs. This would in turn help the individual to shape their careers and be an independent individual. Financial security would erase out a lot of difficulties. People of that community would enjoy good health care, proper education and much more. A society which promotes the culture of job would also see economic stability. People would be more focused towards their self development and mental health by enrolling in various activities like swimming, running and playing as their basic needs are being fulfilled.
Though, I understand there might be people who have a different view point. There is certainly the possibility that people would exploit the luxuries provided to them. There could be climatic damages done which could not be reversed if people started to use too much of heaters, air conditioners and cars when not required. As everything is available quickly people would be quick to forget it's importance. A life provided with luxuries and conveniences could also come with depression as people might have hard time making social connections.
Thus, by evaluation both the sides of the coin, I would state luxuries and conveniences helps out in bringing strong and independent individual if used properly. There are more pros than cons when evaluated meticulously. A society with luxuries and conveniences will witness more social growth, better child development, economic and financial growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... their basic needs are being fulfilled. Though, I understand there might be people who...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...onditioners and cars when not required. As everything is available quickly people ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32273838631 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77184846835 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506112469438 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6869395711 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.652173913 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7826086957 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.39130434783 5.21951772744 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252326228602 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834765424972 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946409450916 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166338113968 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795178197964 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.