Relationship is a basic necessity of human life. There exists no man till date who have managed to survive on own without having any relationship with anyone. In my opinion, truth is vital in any kind of relationship if it is expected to pass the exam of time. It not only helps the relationship to work well in long run but also builds trust among people.
To support my opinion, I would like to present a few examples. For instance, let us consider an office scenario, where a project has been assigned to a group of people. In order for the project to be successfully completed there have to be harmoniously truthful relationship among people present in the group. This would lead them to get along well, understand the differences and also appreciate it. In addition, it would help them to make quick decisions and if any disagreements occur it would be easily solved among the group.
By the same stance, truthfulness is important in personal relationship. Any relationship which experiences betrayal multiple times will be crippled by anxiety and suspicion. To further elaborate my point, I would like to give an example of two siblings, where one of them is a habitual liar. This might, in worse case lead to cases where they might actually need help but are unable to receive it because of the behavioral pattern of lying. In such scenario it would be difficult for the other sibling to trust anything they say.
In contrast, I agree there might be situations which demands one to lie, but I strongly approve of "Honesty is the best policy". It helps people maintain healthy relations where there is trust and genuine empathy. In my opinion, any relationship without truth is compelled to fail. Thus, I would like to conclude by saying truth is utmost important in any relationship. It is rightly said, "Truth that hurts is always better than lie that comforts".
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in contrast, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88235294118 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90843763551 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557275541796 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5849393975 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223912985999 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791404489228 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832051171962 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144902403934 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061538966172 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.