Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Statement claims that important discoveries or creations are accidental because when people document the answer for one question that is used to be an answer to another. I fundamentally agree with the statement with following reason. First, there is definitive term for serendipity. Secondly, most studies are correlated each other. Lastly, originality functions as happenstance to social evaluation.
First and foremost, one of important discoveries in antibiotics is penicillin. But how did they made that antibiotics? It is surely accompanying with scientist’s efforts but for most, there was serendipity. Serendipity is one of similar term for accidental and happenstance. The reason why penicillin is serendipity is because when scientists took a break and came back, they saw pallid mold on the bread. Then, they found the crucial discoveries of finding first antibiotics of history.
Secondly, most studies are correlated each other. While professional studies make future research from previous research, other studies start from very first but with similar subsidiary. For example, science has biology field and biology includes microbiology, cell biology, and physiology and so on. The fundamental value of information from each part has similar vision but when it goes further it will have more specific documents. Therefore, there is only way to find answer to one question that is usually the answer to another.
Finally, originality in mind functions as happenstance toward social evaluation. If there is no people such as Martin Luther King Jr. or Nelson Mandela, society may not be the one that used to be. When there is Jim Crow law for racial segregation during Woodrow Willson tenure, people still just followed because it was law that must be followed. However, Martin Luther King Jr. was different as well as Nelson Mandela, he was civil activist who made vociferous and eloquent speech about human equal right. Because of him, there is not much about racial discrimination.
In conclusion, not all crucial discoveries and creation are not accidental. But the fact that should be conceived is that everything that made impulse or stimuli on to other is law of nature. Further, these three reasons made a important point that many types of discoveries or creation is accidental.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ture. Further, these three reasons made a important point that many types of disc...
^
Line 9, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... discoveries or creation is accidental.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40331491713 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99941998605 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8235281067 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0833333333 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173374930123 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501886513736 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079717995231 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105941523238 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721960760702 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.