Any new innovation is discovered after so many abortive attempts and practices. Each field and idea is interconnected to other field and it is not possible to achieve success in any innovation with a concentration in one field. We cannot say it an accidental but, some discoveries are achieved while working on any correlated fields. Some examples to prove this claim is mentioned below.
A well known accidental theory is an apple and the gravitational force. A man was reading a book and working on some important thesis. Suddenly, an apple fell on his head and that diverted his concentration to a question that why appl fell down only and not went up? And he discovered a gravitational force Earth and other planets are having towards their core. It was an accidental event that gave the world a whole new important theory.
Another possibility of an innovation is an error in earlier innovation. Two people drafted a bird-like design to give the world a vehicle which can make human fly in the sky. That faulty design resulted into helicopter and airplane after so many attempts on the design. So, even an error in the design leads us to think towards new directions which we had not thought of.
Another theory is mentioned here. A person was sitting in a dark room and he noticed a ray coming out of a small flaw. That contained so many little dust particles and then he gave a Darvin's law. This invention was also not intentional but after examining a nature he gave the whole world a new theory.
By examining the above examples, we can say that some innovations are accidental that are created while examining another ideas and which were not intentional.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
Any new innovation is discovered after so many abortive at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 290.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78620689655 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77862573925 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8310809988 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.1111111111 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0900199923824 0.243740707755 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264588572952 0.0831039109588 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026949508352 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0491051526007 0.150359130593 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190698467107 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 14.1392134831 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.