Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system. Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
In this essay, it is discussed by the author that many problems in modern societies could not be solved by different laws or legal systems just because these systems cannot alter what is in people’s hearts or minds. Although many people disagree with this statement, I buttress this idea because it has been postulated that these systems not only stem from different cultures in which iconoclastic peoples are being decried but also many legislators need people’s confirmation to legislate laws.
First and foremost, it has been proven that many peoples may behave differently regarding to laws in variegated countries, cultures, or traditions. What are the obstacles? Laws must be affirmed by cultures although this confirmation needs change which is demanding and taxing, to say at least. As well as, in many countries, people decry iconoclastic individuals. The people could be imprisoned due to their infringing cultures and derived laws. Hence, by legislating according to cultures, people could accept those laws and keep them. Thus, for the first action to solve problems in modern societies, laws or legal systems should be accepted by the status quo cultural system and then will be utilized to solve the societies’ troubles.
Another thing would like to say, by and large, education takes Centre stage for preparing people to confirm the laws. By amending the educational system, governments are able to bolster their legislations as much as possible because people could perceive necessary of doing laws. It can change their mind from possibly unjust to sound laws. If people know about laws’ necessities, they will observe them. Hence, they will confirm and do not infringe laws. Therefore, by amending educational system, legislators could take people’s minds and hearts germane to laws.
Although believing that laws could not change people’s minds, many people declare that forcing to abbey laws could alter their responsibilities in society. For instance, punishing culprits or felons could change people’ mind about various consequences of the infringing law. As an illustrated case, according to Texas governor’s speech, crime rate has taken nosedive from 1998 to 2004 by bolstering and establishing laws which are supporting punishment. Thus, requiring to observe laws, even unjust, could guarantee the sound society.
To sum all reasons up, laws cannot change people’s minds or hearts thoroughly, indeed, it can be deemed that these laws cannot either change or solve many issues in the society. It should be mentioned by appropriate people’s educating and legislating sound laws which are deriving from indigenous cultures of societies, people could do their societal responsibilities. These laws deriving from people’s entities, minds, and hearts; these laws could solve many problems in society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 744, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to solve the societies' troubles. Another thing would like to say, by and ...
^^^
Line 4, column 486, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'observing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: observing
... supporting punishment. Thus, requiring to observe laws, even unjust, could guarantee the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s could solve many problems in society.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, well, another thing, at least, for instance, as well as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2443.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56492027335 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9787133333 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485193621868 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.8567832983 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.045454545 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9545454545 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40909090909 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442487168086 0.243740707755 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143723259994 0.0831039109588 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134330387865 0.0758088955206 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288637485901 0.150359130593 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119244731551 0.0667264976115 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.