It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both ideas by giving your opinion
“Talents are inherited, but they can be furnished too” Tara Westover, Educated, 2018. Even though some people believe that certain talents such as musical or sports gifts are inherited, others posit the talents can be achieved by learning from the good sports person or musicians. As far as I am concerned, talents are the convoluted characteristics which can be achieved by both genetics and learning. In the following, I am inclined to put forth some examples to illustrate the concepts.
First and foremost, no prize for guessing that the genetics take a center stage in transferring specific gifts, talents, or characteristics to the next generation. For instance, Beethoven, a famous musician, had grown in the musicians’ family; his parent and brothers had a good track record as the famous musicians. Although he could learn music from them, he showed his talent when he was a 5 years’ child. It was extraordinary because it elucidated that he had not enough time to learn music. Indeed, the only thing coming to mind is inborn talents.
Another thing coming to the mind is that people can nourish their talents just by learning from others. For example, Michel Jordan is a famous American Basketball player. In fact, when he was a child, his father taught him to play basketball and after 12 years practicing and playing as a tyro basketball player, he finally could show and establish his position in American Basketball National Team. Thus based on the example, the fundamental role of learning is not deniable.
Last but not least, nevertheless many people believe merely in inborn or learned talents, some people claim that the mixture of the two factors is the main reason. As an illustrated case, physicians should learn various things about the diseases, drugs, etc., as well as, they must have inherited talents in the subject such as calculator mind, patience, and so forth. By accounting for the talents, there are only a few doctors who can change the medical researches’ future.
To wrap things up, it is obvious that talents can be transferred to the next generation genetically, however, they can be learned by many connoisseurs in different fields such as music and sports. According to the variegated cases, it seems that both maternal and learned elements play a staple role in forming people’s talents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...n be achieved by learning from the good sports person or musicians. As far as I am con...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thing coming to mind is inborn talents. Another thing coming to the mind is that...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntal role of learning is not deniable. Last but not least, nevertheless many pe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... role in forming people's talents.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, another thing, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15284974093 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91639087122 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556994818653 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7644341816 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22201818351 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06642907425 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604869977099 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122728086231 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503715850791 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.