In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
“jobs or careers increase people’s experiences and pave the ways to their secure future” Tara Westover, Educated, 2018. Even though some people believe that nowadays jobs’ finding is easier than the past, others repudiate this idea. As far as I am concerned, nowadays it is harder to detect what type of job would result in a secure, successful future because of great overlapped skills, changed social requisites, and expanded competitions among people. In the following, I am inclined to put forth some arguments to support my position.
First and foremost, nowadays, willingness for various skills related to apparently different jobs is not deniable. Indeed, many careers and jobs need the skills which overlap with others. For instance, a researcher, in a specific field such as Medical Genetics, not only should be a great statistician but also should have intensified skills in immunology, laboratory technical assessments, and psychology. Thus, thanks to various skills they can find decent jobs, whereas, they are not sure about their jobs’ position and the secure future.
Another thing coming to the mind is that societies’ needs can be changed over time. As an illustrated case, nowadays, some traditional jobs are restricted to museums. Indeed, if someone had predicted a great trend in industrialization, she/he would have adapted to the rigorous changes. Nowadays, industrialization has changed the careers’ perspectives, as well as force them to be altered. Therefore, in many jobs, people cannot predict the jobs’ successful future clearly, however, in the past the people’s success future was guaranteed.
Last but not least, as often as conveniences are growing, as a result, the jobs’ competition increases. In such a condition, if an employee does a peccadillo in his or her job position, the employers fire him immediately because there are many jobs’ requestors. Hence, nowadays, the jobs’ competition is great and halts people to think about the permanent secure, successful future. On the other hand, in the past people were hired in a permanent job position because the competition could not be deemed as a determining factor.
To wrap things up, because of a great jobs’ competition, industrialization, and necessity of learning various overlapped skills, it seems logical to conclude that in the past it was convenient to expect a secure, successful future for both jobs or careers, on the contrary, nowadays, the event is shrouded in a mystery
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends 83
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of 73
- what is a very important skill a person should learn? 73
- People in many countries do not wear their traditional costume Some argue that they would forget their history and tradition Do you agree or disagree 67
- TPO 6 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, another thing, as for, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48979591837 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22517995068 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0292109963 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.555555556 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6111111111 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201614699807 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649094798223 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434414098947 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120148665153 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295372273842 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.