Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
The debate on whether an indicating process of a secure profession was less grueling in the past than now has garnered a range of views. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration to check the constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Some people posit that professions with a bright future were facile to identify. On the other hand, some others take the opposite side and disagree. From my vantage point, I agree with the former group. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite point to be considered is that the fluctuation in the job market. In a narrow condition, many professions have extinct from markets during the last decade and many others have appeared. Unfortunately, this oscillation in the professions has made identifying a secure job a very complex process. For example, since the beginning of the twentieth century, the number of professions in information technology and computer science fields has increased noticeably. A vivid example that can shed light on this subject is one from my brother's experience. After graduating from university with a B.Sc degree in data analysis, he could not find a good job in his field because all companies now are using computers and artificial intelligence for analyzing and illustrating data. Although, before he entered college, many people encouraged him to study this major because it has a successful future.
Secondly, another reason which deserves some words to say is that the augment in the unemployment rate today. According to researchers, the unemployment rate and level have climbed dramatically since 2000. Consequently, careers today are becoming less secure to work in. For instance, research conducted by Harvard university's faculty of economy found that the unfavorable result of the increase in the unemployment rate in the society is how much difficult to find a secure profession between thousands of unemployed.
To wrap it up, in light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that in the past finding a profession with a bright future is facile.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ect is one from my brothers experience. After graduating from university with a B.Sc ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 611, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Sc
...ter graduating from university with a B.Sc degree in data analysis, he could not f...
^^
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...hich deserves some words to say is that the augment in the unemployment rate today. Accordi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i feel, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25574712644 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0233545078 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591954022989 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0459729854 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.611111111 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101920872595 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301825263497 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0244627535554 0.0737576698707 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565886181752 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210306486206 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.