men and women are not equally suited for many tasks
The debate on whether men and women are equal has been going since ages. And it is justified to be so given that there is no easy answer for it. While come point out the inherent physical differences for advocating inequality, others contend that both the genders are equally capable and one gender is not above the other. The prompt suggests that due to their innate physical differences, man and women are not equally suited for many tasks. I agree with the prompt but also hedge my support for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is a bald fact that there are intrinsic physical differences between men and women. Men usually have more muscular body and physical strength. They also possess more mettle than women usually do to perform daunting tasks. This makes them well suited for tasks that are laborious in nature or tasks that are precarious. However, men are not as emotional as women. This makes men less suited for jobs that require emotional understanding. On the other hand, women have high emotional intelligence and can easily understand what other person feels like. This characteristic of women makes them well suited for jobs related to hospitality and caring. It is not possible for men to replace women in such services and provide the customers the same comfort that woman do. Such an attempt by men would in fact turn out to be futile. Therefore, as one can see, the inherent physical differences between men and women make them suited to only a subset of task. However, in the present world, with the change in the kind of jobs as well as with the proliferation of variegated jobs, it would be considered fatuous to assume that men and women are not equally suited for many tasks.
In the present world, with the technological boom, most of the jobs require intellectual capabilities rather than physical capabilities. And there is no such claim or evidence proclaiming that one gender is intellectually superior than other. Thus, it is important to mention that while there are jobs which are not equally suited to both the genders, there are even more jobs that are equally suited to both the genders. For instance, let us consider the jobs in the field of Information technology, Banking, Retail etc. The jobs in these fields and the like would require astute personnel and both the genders are equally capable critical thinking. Therefore, there are quite a number of jobs that are equally suired for both men and women.
To recapitulate, there are jobs that are not equally suited for both men and women due to the inherent nature of the jobs as well as the innate differences in men and women. However, there also jobs that are equally suited
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...t one gender is intellectually superior than other. Thus, it is important to mention...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in fact, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83043478261 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54797076307 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.419565217391 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4538836009 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.88 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.530668936179 0.243740707755 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163146583956 0.0831039109588 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112496494066 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363448141449 0.150359130593 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105390992913 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.