Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
The conclusion drawn in the opinion of the letter is invalid due to several reasons including a major one, as it does not clarify exactly why the spaced flights carrying humans are dangerous. It has been stated once that the risks and costs associating with sending humans in a space expedition are high but that does not suffice as an explanation for the danger that the writer is so worried about. When an astronaut is on a space expedition, he or she has full consent for the actions associated with the probable dangerous issues that can engender during the voyage, so it is unlikely that any unfair or harmful treatment is done to them due to the risky issues involved with the flights.
Additionally, it has not been mentioned anywhere that the high cost requirement for manned space tour arrangements are higher in comparision with the unmanned space ones. Thus, it does not imply that sending space probes and sattelites are cheaper by any means, or that it uses less amount of resources than carrying humans in spaceships do. Implicating that manned space flights cost us more investments due to more consumption of resources is a seriously misjudgedged calculation.
The letter also informs us that a great deal of information have been acquired by sending the sattelites into space successfully, but this cannot anyhow be demonstrated as an equal measure of the information that astronauts might have collected along their own space journeys. Astronauts are humans who can also detect changes differently than a machine does, and that itself can add more value to the information that he or she would share regarding space. It is absolutely invalid to summarise that since space probes have successfully gathered a great amount of important information, hence it must be equally, or more valuable than the details acquired from humans' space expeditons.
Thus, I conclude that the assumption made by the writer has several flaws that we cannot overlook, and his or her opinion regarding prevention of investment in manned space flights due to the faulty reasons are insensible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...r is so worried about. When an astronaut is on a space expedition, he or she has ...
Line 9, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...n. The letter also informs us that a great deal of information have been ac...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, regarding, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07803468208 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81345132707 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517341040462 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8236838327 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.7 118.986275619 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 23.4991977007 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0324187092195 0.243740707755 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0137413928635 0.0831039109588 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0176035613544 0.0758088955206 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0182449965578 0.150359130593 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113561135662 0.0667264976115 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 19.8 14.1392134831 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.