Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Physical differences can be defined as differences in body structure or strengths. There exists such physical differences between men and women which are clearly seena and these differences are inherent. However there are many cases where women have proved themselves equal or superior to men.
Men are considered to be comparitively more muscular than women. This makes men suitable for jobs that require strength such as carrying heavy loads from one place to another. Most of the times men are seen doing these things. Moreover, it becomes unsafe for women to work or travel late night but it is comparitively less unsafe for men to do so. Furthermore, women also face certain problems such as pregnancy or periods which re personal and inherent to them. This make them not suitable for some kind of jobs.
Nonetheless, having all such problems in life never stopped women from doing great things. Today, women have proven themselves in all fields. They have shown that they are not only equal to men but also superior in some cases. For instance, Kalpana Chawla, an Indo-American austronaut who went to space along with a group of men and women. There are various such instances where women have done great things equal or more than what men could have done.
Nowadays, women have proved themselves to be more intelligent than men. Physical differences inherent to women make them less suited for some jobs which men are suited for. This being true, never stopped women from achieving what they wanted. Women made themselves equally or more suitable for jobs that men are suitable for. So asserting that men and women cannot be equally suited for many tasks may not be right.
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.50
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...ena and these differences are inherent. However there are many cases where women have p...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, for instance, kind of, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 58.6224719101 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 283.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95759717314 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44186230277 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505300353357 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1080803941 60.3974514979 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.8421052632 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8947368421 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356271159412 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125372457053 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873987847245 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236817966047 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906008618923 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.