Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
I mostly disagree with this statement in the prompt.
In some cases and some fields, men and women due to their inherent differences not equally suited for many tasks.
In some cases and some fields, the more difference you see physically, the job and work supports that. Take an example of Industrialization, where the industry doesn't accept women due to their difference from men. For example, In the steel industry, women can not work due to their less physical strength and bulk of muscles, also they are weak physically as compared to males. That's the reason due to which they won't choose females for that job. This phenomenon is not confined to the world of industries, however, it is also present in the army where before selecting a good person they separate the males and females. Due to the differences in the physical structure of the female and the natural phenomenon through which they go. For example, due to the fewer quadriceps and biceps strength, they cannot climb and run as fast as men's do. This is the main reason for not considering them. Also, they do not look bold in their opinion.
Focusing on talent rather than physical appearance would help in the development of the nation. However, in most cases, there is no need to check the physical differences just to allow working. Take the waiter of a restaurant, got instance. If a person can serve customers and talk to them properly, with the proper and polite response that is the main key of an owner. This shows that skill is more important than inherent appearance which is not human-made nor human choice.
Concentrating on another point that the things which make one different from other in terms of physical appearance. Moreover, numerous examples illustrate that focus on skill, timeline and work management that would lead the company or firm to grow. For illustration take an example of the medical field where there is no discrimination between the physical appearance and people trust doctors or health workers blindly without doubting them. Just because they were in need and the person would help according to the speciality of that particular field. For example, a recent pandemic of the Corona Virus has shown this thing that no matter what has been inherited in terms of appearance if you have skills you can help or save anyone's life without thinking about the other side.
By concluding that, it is not good to consider to make a decision based on the appearance and traits rather look for the skills and talents. In this way, the author has not supported the ideas and explained them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...f Industrialization, where the industry doesnt accept women due to their difference fr...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 379, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e weak physically as compared to males. Thats the reason due to which they wont choos...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h is not human-made nor human choice. Concentrating on another point that the ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 501, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to accord' or 'accord'.
Suggestion: to accord; accord
... were in need and the person would help according to the speciality of that particular fi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...without thinking about the other side. By concluding that, it is not good to co...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, so, for example, in most cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86199095023 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58939097858 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511312217195 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5263691014 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4347826087 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2173913043 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47826086957 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177130023628 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528272852326 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497054033637 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09660430069 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690461129079 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.