Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tas
Men and Women both are peas of the same pod.The notion that men and women are different from each other in terms of physical appearances,, is undoubtedly true, however it has demarcated their roles in the society. Men have always been given the role of bread-earner and women a family nurturer. In the growing times, globally we have seen the differences between men and women narrowing down; personally or professionally both men and women have proved themselves. In the 21st century, we see activate participation of women in various fields, competing men and proving the notion wrong in every possible way. Women today contribute equally in taskforce, economy and growth of the country. Not only are they nurturing their family but also earning the bread.
Physical differences is just one part of all the other essential factors for assigning the role. Given the fact, that women go through monthly menstural cycle and pregnancy are only those few times when they may not be in a good physical health condition. But on the other days women are as strong as capable as men. Women are equally participating in corporate sectors, medical, teaching, writing, army, space, etc. There is not a thing nor a field that women have not been able to make it. For example,The first time NASA sent astronaunts to moon, there were only 4 men although few years later we saw lady astronaunts like Kalpana Chawla, Sunita Williams mark their presence on the moon.
To support my stance, there are many examples like 50% of banking sector in India comprises of women. Germany's Vice Chancellor is a women, Angela Markel. Physical differences have never been a reason to sit back and give up. Women like this are mirror and answer to people to believe they are not suited for many task.
In order to conclude, I would also state how men today are equally contributing nurturing their families, bringing up their kids, being house-husbands. It is simply a mindset.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...and Women both are peas of the same pod.The notion that men and women are different...
^^^
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...h other in terms of physical appearances,, is undoubtedly true, however it has dem...
^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , The
...ve not been able to make it. For example,The first time NASA sent astronaunts to moo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...les like 50% of banking sector in India comprises of women. Germanys Vice Chancellor is a wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...s of women. Germanys Vice Chancellor is a women, Angela Markel. Physical differences ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...of women. Germanys Vice Chancellor is a women, Angela Markel. Physical differences ha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun task seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tasks'.
Suggestion: many tasks
...ople to believe they are not suited for many task. In order to conclude, I would also ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 330.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9303030303 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6487778078 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4117066459 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3888888889 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381570195798 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107455581791 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563696763343 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216633811524 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501378367183 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.