Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
The author claims that men and women are not equally suited for many works by citing the reason that the two genders have inherent physical differences. I concede men and women have different physical traits which make some tasks difficult for gender with the supposed disadvantage. But it is not to mean that it is entirely not suited for them. With practice and regularization of tasks, every works can be done by all people irrespective of the gender.
To begin, I admit the corporeal differences between male and female body is distinct and seeing other species of mammals, the differences account for various roles assigned naturally. The woman body has thinner bone density and most female compared to the male of their area or location, are shorter. These kinds of difference can cause some hindrance to do few tasks. To provide some instances, the heavier tasks in an industry can be difficult for a girl to do compared to the boy or the works where height is the prime requirements, could be done by man more easily. Similarly, this hindrance is not limited to women. The works needing hip actions can be problematic for a boy due to their restricted hip mobility. Moreover, the natural ability to give birth is completely restricted for male only because of lack of the physical organ to bear a child. So, the features provided by the nature itself highlights that the roles are to be separate for men and women.
However, the limitation due to physical difference is not and should not be permanent irrespective of the genders. We, human beings, are intellectual and possess more understanding and learning capabilites than other animals. Even if the nature separated the roles for different genders, our thinking ability have enabled us to break the physical barrier. In this present world, there is no task restricted to a particular person. I admit there could be some difficulties in the beginning, but with repeated practice and utilization of creative ideas along with the inventions out there in the world, any person, despite the physical gap, can perform the tasks. For instance, the heavy weight championship was confined to male in the past. It was thought that sports were not for women. But with every practices, and investment towards the fields, now it has come to such time when the men and women sports could be played between one another. So, the present discoveries, creative ability and constant practices have really brought the change and no physical difference can stop a gender to pursue the task they want to perform.
To sum it up, the author's point is valid upto a point that the nature provided role can cause few restrictions to respective genders. However, recent advancement have ceded the restrictions causing to advance all roles to all men and women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 681, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...an perform the tasks. For instance, the heavy weight championship was confined to male in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'advancing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: advancing
...ent have ceded the restrictions causing to advance all roles to all men and women.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, really, similarly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2335.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94703389831 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71053247879 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493644067797 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 740.7 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2328423755 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.52173913 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5217391304 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73913043478 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357958983704 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970153492172 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086676991184 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209901674664 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119008635705 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.