Looking back to the contemporary culture of the past few decades, you may see some differences in fashion, arts styles and media, and uses in technology. While we always outgrow some of these trends, other trends take their place. To understand these changes in contemporary culture, the most efficient way is to analyze the trends of its youth.
For example, looking into fashion and style of past generations, it's always teens and young adults that are always the trend setters. Back in the 1980s, womens style was to have big hair and shoulder pads. The fashion always showed younger women on their magazine covers with these styles, and it was younger women that bought that style. These trends have changed to a more relaxed and sleeker style in today's generation, but it’s younger people starting and holding on to these styles. Older generation during the 1980’s, or in any time period for that matter, have the tendency to wear outdated styles, problaby styles that reflect the time when they were younger.
Another example that the best way to understand contemporary culture is to look at youth trends is to look at a time periods art and media. In the 1950s, going to the drive in movie theater was considered one of the best ways to view a movie. This form of movie watching really appealed to youth because it allowed the comfort and privacy of your own car for you and your highschool sweetheart. Older people in that time never caught on to this and continued to view movies in theaters. Today's youth found it more convenient to skip the movie theater and just view a movie right off of their laptop.
Lastly, the technology usage in any given time has always been dominated by youth. Whether it was the invention of the internet, or the introduction of electricity into a common home, teens and young adults always jump on the bandwagon with new technological advancements and with the latest gadgets. And in each generation of youth, shortly after you have older people complaining how “kids have it so easy with this new device’ or how “kids don't need this new kind of technology.” The same could be said today with youth wanting the latest smartphone or the fastest personal computer. It has always been youth that have been buying new technology and driving different tech companies to continue to improve for the next generation.
Looking at the any given generation, contemporary culture is always seen in within its youth. Youth are the trend-setters that go after the latest styles, forms of entertainment, and technology. It is because of youth that these different industries strive to improve to match the desires and needs of future generation. Older people tend to stay within their own comfort level when it comes culture and should not be looked at when analyzing contemporary culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... fashion and style of past generations, its always teens and young adults that are ...
^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Older) must be used with a third-person verb: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
...u and your highschool sweetheart. Older people in that time never caught on to this an...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 459, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...this new device' or how 'kids dont need this new kind of technology.'...
^^^^
Line 9, column 101, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... always seen in within its youth. Youth are the trend-setters that go after the lat...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, look, may, really, so, while, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2381.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96041666667 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65367195154 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9179537627 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.380952381 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52380952381 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185049925174 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597656957909 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575188762564 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117428779104 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595176169555 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.