The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.
After careful and objective analysis about this issue, I would like to present a slightly deviated position from the argument. The culture of youth developing a subculture - as a part of contemporary culture. But we can not ignore other representative groups’ culture, such as the older generation, which contemporary culture also included.
First of all, analyzing the trends of the youth could understand some parts of contemporary culture, because youth is part of the present and certainly part of the future and its culture. By studying the young people's actions, we could comprehend some parts of culture better. For example, Facebook nowadays is our main method to connect to others, rarely depending on traditional phones or email. And Facebook - we knew that it was founded by a group of Harvard College students, then flourishing among the U.S. students, even spreading its culture to all over the world. In this case, it is mainly through the youth that we can gather the idea that Facebook is popular in our society. Thus, some aspects of a culture are certainly represented in the youth trends.
However, in some cases, it is hard to understand contemporary culture only by studying in youth groups. In fact, youth usually prepare more to accept new things and therefore is apt to be influenced by foreign culture. With the multinational corporation and intercommunication of different nations, these different cultures influence each other and then give birth to a multi-culture. This new culture could not be representative of a whole nation - just like a short time of enthusiasm among these young people, such as wearing weird clothes and coloring hair. These behaviors only explain that is a starting point of the culture change.
Finally, studying the youth's trend is far from sufficient if one wishes to gain a full knowledge of a nation's contemporary culture. It is obvious that habits and hobbies of the youth differ so greatly from the older generation. People at every age group are representative of their certain historical culture time. We will get biased conclusions if we only study youth trends since youth can not represent the whole human. Therefore, we should put both the youth and the elder together under consideration, so that we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of its contemporary culture.
In conclusion, it is partially true that analyzing the trends of its youth could be an effective way to explain contemporary culture in some cases. But to conclude a more comprehensive understanding, we should take both the youth and older generation into consideration. After all, only studying trends through all ages can allow us to understand this whole present culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
... one wishes to gain a full knowledge of a nations contemporary culture. It is obvious tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, after all, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18367346939 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02332127843 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498866213152 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4182114947 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.909090909 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0454545455 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86363636364 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35232321377 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109053450998 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10416696444 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217518716011 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769691658017 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.