A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The topic presents the controversial issue of whether a nation should obligate all of its students to follow the same curriculum. Certainly, it is reasonable that basic subjects should be included in all sorts of curricular. However, it does not mean that a national government has to interfere with every detail of educational curricular. In this case, there would be problems, such as violation of the freedom of choice and biased interpretations of specific educational contents. Therefore, I argue that the same national curriculum should not be imposed upon every school.
Admittedly, there are very basic subjects that most pundits of education consider as necessary parts for primary and secondary educations. For example, it is agreed that every student has to learn national language and mathmatics. Therefore, it is natural for governments to formulate specific guidelines that require all types of schools, regardless of their orientations and attitudes, to incorporate several basic subjects into their curricular. As a matter of fact, the majority of countries on the planet have legalized these basic comulsory courses. However, this fact does not mean that all school curricular have to be identical in every detail and it is not desirable if national governments are inclined to regulate the curricular in this direction.
Firstly, it is highly probable that the same national curriculm encroches the freedom of choice. Students have different interests and abilities and it is their right to choose what they want to learn. Some students may intend to focus on learning foreign languages, while some others aspire to profoundly study physics or chemistry. Therefore, if the government forcibly introduces the same curriculm regulating every subject, those students would lose the opportunities to follow their own interests and imporve their standard of knowledge.
In addition, each school has its own ideological orientations and many students consider them for their choice as well. Thus, regulation of ideological contents of the school education would result in violation of the rights of both students and schools. In the 20th century, the Turkish military regime forced every school to adopt secular education and abandon any sort of religious education. As there were many students who were eager to take courses teaching religion, a number of demonstrations and conflicts happened. Many schools closed their doors as well. This case fully demonstrates dangerous results of the forceful intervention.
In conclusion, it is admissible that several basic subjects should be included in school curricular. However, it does not mean that nations have a right to force specific programs to every school. If it happens, both schools and students' freedom would be violated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould not be imposed upon every school. Admittedly, there are very basic subject...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...late the curricular in this direction. Firstly, it is highly probable that the ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... imporve their standard of knowledge. In addition, each school has its own ide...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... results of the forceful intervention. In conclusion, it is admissible that sev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, sort of, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2366.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47685185185 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94670016088 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490740740741 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3196495853 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.869565217 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7826086957 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164563804153 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553004321317 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556088691874 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997157141951 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558911465832 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.