A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The authority is in charge of the fulfilment of provision the fundamentals of education to its citizens by developing school curricula. However, it is not the case that they have to apply the same pattern for the entire school systems within the country. I completely disagree with this statement as students applying to colleges or universities should have an opportunity to have a predilection for subjects, not mentioned to the freedom of choice. Moreover, this scheme would not been satiated by students because their skills at certain subject may vary significantly, as a result, it is vital to take specific approaches.
In the past, students accustomed to study certain subjects such as mathematics, chemistry, and physics altogether. Nevertheless, this approach has already been obsolete because thanks for the advance in technology, a student studying programming would literally waste their valuable time if they focus on humanitarian subjects like history. For instance, the school, which has recently introduced, named after Al-Khwarizmi concentrate on solely mathematics and programming to boost the skills of young talents to be master in IT domain. Graduating this school, the majority of students would pursue their tertiary education in computer science.
Another major downside could be the restriction of optional choices by the youth. It is not uncommon to see that students have virtually the same educational backgrounds which leads them to be uncertain about their further education. It is of importance that school administrator should deem the willingness of their students, and then implement holistic measures to meet their preferences. Cambridge International School in Tashkent, as an example, provides their student to select optional subjects which they are willing to. Having this method, the school has attracted public attention because their students have had higher academic achievements and been remarkably competitive to study in universities.
Studying the same school subjects could be beneficial, though, it cannot holistically assure the achievements of their students in that the range of knowledge and skills might differ from one another. Take people, as an example, who have nature ability for music, but are not good at mathematics. Therefore, the curriculum of school focused on science subjects are ought to distinguish this of the school of music.
In conclusion, unless the official averts from applying similar curriculum in schools as there are some repercussions for adolescents who can be hindered to be professional in certain realm or to have flexible choices. By doing so, there will be tremendous improvement in education system, and students will take advantage of it in the long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istinguish this of the school of music. In conclusion, unless the official avert...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54028436019 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06775680676 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542654028436 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3175823716 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.888888889 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132990992554 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464590335878 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293750892509 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802201262462 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240928964048 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.