The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar graph illustrates the proportion of US people visited fast food restaurant in the years of 2003, 2006, and 2013.
In 2003, nearly one-third of consumers ate in fast food restaurant once a week. The figure for this people increased to 33% in 2006
before dropping to about 28% in 2013. In the first years, 30% of US consumers who ate junk food in restaurants on a monthly basis. In 2006, one-third of US people
visited fast food restaurants once or twice a month. However, the figure for these people had risen to 33% by 2013. Between 2003 and 2013, 15-20% of US citizens
ate fast food in restaurants. People who visited fast food restaurants a few times a year were below 10% over the 10-year period. The least majority of US people either visited every day or never visited to fast food restaurants.
Overall, it is clear that the majority people over the whole period preferred to visit fast food restaurants either on weekly or monthly basis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... restaurant once a week. The figure for this people increased to 33% in 2006 befor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for this people increased to 33% in 2006 before dropping to about 28% in 2013. In...
^^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y basis. In 2006, one-third of US people visited fast food restaurants once or tw...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72189349112 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50858265565 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497041420118 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.932624102 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.8 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375414841826 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180410742393 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758519325948 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225231587373 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497022741911 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.