A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Some people are of the opinion that every student should study the same syllabus until they finish school. However, I disagree with this as I believe a student should have the right to study whatever suits their interest, but I do concede with this idea in extreme situations.
Firstly, if every student of a country is forced to study the same curriculum it leaves no room for them to explore their own interests. For example, let's say the curriculum that the nation enforces is mostly oriented toward mathematics, students who are interested in music will feel that this is a burden to study as their interest lies elsewhere.
Secondly, if every student studies the same syllabus, it may lead to potential unemployment. For example, if there are a thousand students in a country and the curriculum is focused mainly on chemistry, and let's say there are a hundred jobs related to said subject, then this would definitely lead to an issue as there would be nine hundred students without a job. Since the students were never taught to innovate and explore new ideas they would be lost.
Some may argue that following the same curriculum would help give students a sense of direction as it would avoid the confusion of choice. But this would only take away the students freedom. In conclusion, students should feel free to choose the subjects they like.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...lum is focused mainly on chemistry, and lets say there are a hundred jobs related to...
^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...w ideas they would be lost. Some may argue that following the same curriculum woul...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...oice. But this would only take away the students freedom. In conclusion, students should...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 2235.4752809 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 232.0 442.535393258 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88362068966 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53172131407 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547413793103 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 704.065955056 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.086582059 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.21951772744 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173043952756 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801064488712 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317492431745 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112955916137 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179648498866 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 100.480337079 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.