The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Some people are of the opinion that the real talent of a musician is only known after he or she has been dead for many generations. However, I strongly disagree with this statement and believe that one shouldn't wait generations after the musician is dead to assess them for the following two reason.
Firstly, if assessing true talent of a person meant that he or she should be dead for several generations then there wouldn't be so many popular musicians who are in the good books of many critics. For example, let's look at the case of Michael Jackson. He was termed the 'King of Pop' even before he reached the end of his career. What this meant was people knew his true talent without waiting for several generations for him to pass away. If the above prompt were true then this title given to him and the awards he won would all just be to please him or his fans, which is most definitely not the case.
Secondly, a good critic is one who is unbiased and reviews the talent of a person without being guided by his or her fame. If real talent of musicians were known only years after they pass then that would mean that the performers are being fed whole lot of lies throughout their career and that all the awards they have won would eventually amount to nothing, which would only serve to anger their fans and family for generations to come as their favorite artists were not given the recognition they deserve even though they were popular during their time.
Some people may argue that a musician's work needs to stand the test of time in order to completely be given a fair shot. However this incorrect and a musician can be correctly assessed even though he or she is still. Hence, people need not wait a hundred years in order to completely know the true potential of an artist.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ith this statement and believe that one shouldnt wait generations after the musician is ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...dead for several generations then there wouldnt be so many popular musicians who are in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
... mean that the performers are being fed whole lot of lies throughout their career and tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
... not given the recognition they deserve even though they were popular during their t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...der to completely be given a fair shot. However this incorrect and a musician can be co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48623853211 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24828676275 2.79657885939 80% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504587155963 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.1289009816 60.3974514979 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317191788449 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1186876484 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866720291575 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192376475304 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067415909043 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 100.480337079 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.