A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Here in the given statement, it has been asked to keep the same curriculum for all the students in a nation. At first glance it looks fine but if we think in detail we would find it not relevant at all. Asking for the same national curriculum is too much. After going through the below paragraphs one can relate to why this is not a good suggestion to feed every student the same knowledge till the time they enter the college.

Firstly every student has a different area of interest and asking that person to study the other subject or language would not be justifiable. For example, if one could have asked Ramanujam to study English till then for sure he would not have explored his area of interest which was maths and the world would have missed recognizing a great mathematician of all times.

Secondly, if we see the time is changing very fast and the competition is growing even with the faster pace. So, it is important for students to get into their area of interest in the early stage of life and start exploring it in depth. For example, if someone finds interest in coding and he starts coding at one early stage of life instead of completing his/her 10th and 12th standards exam then for sure he would have an edge over other fellows who starts coding later or after entering into college.

After going through the above two paragraphs we can say that it is surely not favorable to spent too much time in same national curriculum till 16 17 years of age.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'standards'' or 'standard's'?
Suggestion: standards'; standard's
...ead of completing his/her 10th and 12th standards exam then for sure he would have an edg...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ater or after entering into college. After going through the above two paragraphs ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 268.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51492537313 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34422217157 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5164440462 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191234684692 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956721077805 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916212051142 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124704766444 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990639915177 0.0667264976115 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 100.480337079 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.