“A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Superfically the authors intent might seem be of greater intenet but carefully considering from multiple perspective would definitely assay the requirement of same national curriculum being adopted and its implications on the future leaders and denizens of the country. It would be of greater evil when we consider that same national curriculum being implemented throughout the nation.
Students who are the offsprings of the nation is going to be hamstrung with such a idealogy been implemented; they would be encouraged to follow what someone says, instead of making their own decision in most cases. A same national curriculum mean their choices are take away right at their childhood, this would make them effectively impussiant which would make their learning rote or neither motivational. To illustrate, Sudbury schools which gives the option for students to shape their own curriculum has marked several advantages whose output students are considered significantly well in their college due to reason that the students being involved in decision-making process of their career. This further motivate them to puruse their career in perusal instead of following a non clean slate approach whoch would be blocking their thinking process all together.
Further being made powerless, the students would signifcantly lack the rich and diverse background or specilaztion because of the ubquitious education curriculum which would make the college significantly boring. Students go to college just not to learn from books but from their peers which are made by diverse backgrounds of education to tradition, when a common curriculum is made and adopted this would make the learning process in college less rich. Not everyone has the opportunity to go Columbain college which is considered as the epitiome of the school education because of its curriculum, when same curriculum is implemented it would impede the competetion right from childhood which would be siginificant dearth of shortage of talents of future denziens. College is a stretch; some would like to be an artist or interested in music which would lacking in the same national curriculum.
It might be advantegeous in producing students to college of same quality by adopting a national curriculum but that woube nothing but an output of mass produced factory. Though such an assertion might be made of because of diverese quality being delivered by curriculum which should be fixed by stringent control of curriculum being delivered to the students rather than adopting the one size for all curriculum approach.
Everyone has their own prejudiced or imparted views when they pursue their schooling with an impetus to be something. Nation wide curriculum would signifcantly hamper students to explore and experiment any such opportunites. A curriculum should act as a guiding force rather than being didactic tool for those young minds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tion is going to be hamstrung with such a idealogy been implemented; they would b...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...their thinking process all together. Further being made powerless, the students woul...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: NATION_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nationwide'?
Suggestion: Nationwide
...ooling with an impetus to be something. Nation wide curriculum would signifcantly hamper st...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44370860927 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.906288119 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481236203091 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9341511236 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.4 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.13333333333 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184705927659 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863275170602 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310221911456 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123892616212 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00727383567674 0.0667264976115 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 14.1392134831 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.